Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33284
Title: Father trait anger and associations with father-infant bonding and caregiving: The mediating role of mentalizing.
Austin Authors: Francis, Lauren M;Greenwood, Christopher J;Enticott, Peter G;Mansour, Kayla A;Smith, Imogene;Graeme, Liam G;Olsson, Craig A;Milgrom, Jeannette ;Skouteris, Helen;Macdonald, Jacqui A
Affiliation: Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.;Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Parent-Infant Research Institute
Health and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.;Warwick Business School, Warwick University, Coventry, UK.
Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.;Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.;Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Issue Date: 6-Jul-2023
Date: 2023
Publication information: Family Process 2023-07-06
Abstract: Trait anger reflects a tendency to feel irritation, annoyance, and rage, and involves a narrowing of cognition and attention. This narrowed scope may impact the capacity to understand the mental states of oneself and others (mentalizing), which for fathers of infants may compromise bonding and caregiving involvement. Here, we investigated the extent to which mentalizing mediated the relationship between father trait anger and both father-infant bonding and father involvement in infant caregiving. Data were from 168 fathers (M = 30.04 years of age, SD = 1.36) of 190 infants (M = 7.58 months of age, SD = 5.06) in the longitudinal Men and Parenting Pathways (MAPP) study. We assessed fathers' preconception trait anger at Wave 1 and their mentalizing 2 years later at Wave 3. At Waves 3, 4, and/or 5, we assessed father-infant bonding and father involvement in infant caregiving when men had an infant younger than 18 months of age. Associations were examined using path analysis. Poorer mentalizing fully mediated the relationship between preconception trait anger and father-infant bonding (total score), but not involvement in infant caregiving. Further, poorer mentalizing fully mediated the relationships between trait anger and each component of the father-infant bond (i.e., patience and tolerance, affection and pride, and pleasure in interactions). Findings suggest that for men high on trait anger, targeted interventions that facilitate mentalizing capacities may help to develop a foundation for a strong father-infant bond. Interventions may be offered on becoming a father (perinatal), or prior to becoming a father (preconception) to prevent future bonding problems.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33284
DOI: 10.1111/famp.12912
ORCID: 0000-0002-4050-5711
0000-0002-9211-6312
0000-0002-6638-951X
0000-0002-4165-3943
0000-0003-2576-8182
0000-0003-4497-2103
0000-0002-5927-2014
0000-0002-4082-4595
0000-0001-9959-5750
0000-0001-9451-2709
Journal: Family Process
PubMed URL: 37414415
ISSN: 1545-5300
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: bonding
fathers
infants
involvement
mentalizing
trait anger
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

12
checked on Nov 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.