Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33146
Title: Serological screening for cytomegalovirus during pregnancy: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements.
Austin Authors: Xie, Maria;Tripathi, Tanya;Holmes, Natasha E ;Hui, Lisa 
Affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.;Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.;Mercy Perinatal, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.;Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Northern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.;Reproductive Epidemiology Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Infectious Diseases
Issue Date: 13-Jun-2023
Date: 2023
Publication information: Prenatal Diagnosis 2023-06; 43(7)
Abstract: Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is the most common congenital infection worldwide. cCMV can lead to severe long-term sequelae, including neurological impairment and developmental delay. We performed a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines containing recommendations concerning serological screening for CMV during pregnancy. We performed a search of MEDLINE, Turning Research into Practice (TRIP) database and the grey literature for clinical practice guidelines or consensus statements published in the English language from Jan 2010 to June 2022. The quality of the included guidelines was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Textual synthesis was used to summarise and compare the recommendations on CMV serological screening in pregnancy. Eleven guidelines and two consensus statements were included. None recommended universal serological screening for CMV in pregnant women; five recommended screening for high-risk women (those with frequent contact with young children). The overall quality of the guidelines varied; most were medium or low. Although clinical practice guidelines do not actively recommend routine serological screening in pregnancy, most did not meet standard processes for development and predated the emerging data on valaciclovir as a potential intervention. Existing recommendations are underpinned by limited, low-level evidence, exposing the lack of robust data in this area of practice. Further high-level evidence and methodologically robust guidelines are needed to guide clinical practice in this rapidly changing field.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33146
DOI: 10.1002/pd.6397
ORCID: 0000-0002-1723-6365
0000-0002-9720-3562
Journal: Prenatal Diagnosis
PubMed URL: 37309996
ISSN: 1097-0223
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Dec 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.