Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/32842
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLe, Allan-
dc.contributor.authorLambers, Anton Philip-
dc.contributor.authorFraval, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorHardidge, Andrew J-
dc.contributor.authorBalakumar, Jitendra-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-12T02:59:49Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-12T02:59:49Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09-
dc.identifier.citationANZ Journal of Surgery 2023-09; 93(9)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1445-2197-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/32842-
dc.description.abstractVirtual reality (VR) has proved to be a useful technology beyond the field of surgery in areas that are highly dependent on consolidating motor tasks. Despite being reliant on these skills, the uptake of VR in orthopaedics has been extremely limited. Therefore, this study's purpose was to help assess the utility of applying this technology in teaching different experience levels of orthopaedic training. Secondary objectives were to assess enjoyability and feasibility to complete modules prior to surgery. The study explored which experience level of orthopaedic trainee benefits the most from the proposed haptic VR package. Participants completed a total hip arthroplasty module using the Fundamental Surgery package. Qualitative data was collected in the form of a post completion survey of 24 participants. Quantitative data was collected in the form of module completion time and percentage of skills completed. 37.5% of participants rated non-training orthopaedic registrars as the experience level that would benefit the most from using VR. 88% of participants would recommend this module to a colleague and found the module very enjoyable (4.2 out of 5). 50% of participants took between 25 and 31.5 min to finish and completed between 80% and 95% of tasks in the module. The study demonstrated that non-training orthopaedic registrars were most likely to benefit using this particular VR package. Most users found the experience to be enjoyable and would recommend it to a colleague. It was also deemed feasible to complete the module prior to performing an operation.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjecthaptic feedbacken_US
dc.subjectorthopaedicsen_US
dc.subjectsurgical educationen_US
dc.subjectvirtual realityen_US
dc.titleUtility assessment of virtual reality technology in orthopaedic surgical training.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleANZ Journal of Surgeryen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationOrthopaedic Surgeryen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ans.18501en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6052-4952en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7796-6047en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1578-5563en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1036-9974en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4269-5595en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid37128774-
local.name.researcherHardidge, Andrew J-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptOrthopaedic Surgery-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

28
checked on Jul 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.