Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/32603
Title: Efficacy of Flash Glucose Monitoring in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
Austin Authors: Liang, Bonnie;Koye, Digsu N;Hachem, Mariam;Zafari, Neda;Braat, Sabine;Ekinci, Elif I 
Affiliation: Medicine (University of Melbourne)
Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Endocrinology
Issue Date: 2022
Date: 2022
Publication information: Frontiers in Clinical Diabetes and Healthcare 2022; 3
Abstract: Flash glucose monitoring (FlashGM) is a sensor-based technology that displays glucose readings and trends to people with diabetes. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the effect of FlashGM on glycaemic outcomes including HbA1c, time in range, frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes and time in hypo/hyperglycaemia compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose, using data from randomised controlled trials. A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL for articles published between 2014 and 2021. We selected randomised controlled trials comparing flash glucose monitoring to self-monitoring of blood glucose that reported change in HbA1c and at least one other glycaemic outcome in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Two independent reviewers extracted data from each study using a piloted form. Meta-analyses using a random-effects model was conducted to obtain a pooled estimate of the treatment effect. Heterogeneity was assessed using forest plots and the I2 statistic. We identified 5 randomised controlled trials lasting 10 - 24 weeks and involving 719 participants. Flash glucose monitoring did not lead to a significant reduction in HbA1c. However, it resulted in increased time in range (mean difference 1.16 hr, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.19, I2 = 71.7%) and decreased frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes (mean difference -0.28 episodes per 24 hours, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.04, I2 = 71.4%). Flash glucose monitoring did not lead to a significant reduction in HbA1c compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose, however, it improved glycaemic management through increased time in range and decreased frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42020165688).
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/32603
DOI: 10.3389/fcdhc.2022.849725
ORCID: 
Journal: Frontiers in Clinical Diabetes and Healthcare
Start page: 849725
PubMed URL: 36992733
ISSN: 2673-6616
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: diabetes mellitus
flash glucose monitoring
glycated haemoglobin A1c
hyperglycaemia
hypoglycaemia
meta-analysis
self-monitoring blood glucose
systematic review
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Nov 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.