Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30981
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXu, Heng-
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Zhu-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jun-
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Dongchao-
dc.contributor.authorPan, Jiadong-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xin-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Hua-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Sally-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yixin-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-07T05:29:58Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-07T05:29:58Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-01-
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of plastic surgery 2022; 89(4): 451-458en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30981-
dc.description.abstractAlthough the angiosome concept is a well-accepted theory, unexpected necrosis suggests that other factors can influence the flap survival. Our study uses the rat model to explore the flow capacity of the choke vessels across 2 angiosomes. The medioventral line of Sprague-Dawley rats' abdominal flap was equally divided into 4 sections, which were preserved in 7 different groups (n = 6/group): A, no dissection; B to D, preserve the inferior 1/4, 2/4, and 3/4 sections; E to G, preserve the superior 1/4, 2/4, and 3/4 sections. The ratio (%) of the survival area of the distal/proximal territory was calculated. Indocyanine green, lead-oxide gel imaging, hematoxylin and eosin, and CD31 histology tests were performed. Compared with 96.0 ± 1.4% flap survival in group A, groups B, C, and D had distal territory flap loss (34.8% ± 4.1%, 65.0% ± 3.7%, and 94.3% ± 3.1% respectively). Group E lost the majority of the distal territory (3.5% ± 2.4%), whereas groups F and G (15.5% ± 3.8% and 79.2% ± 3.3%, respectively) had larger flap survival. Except for groups A and D, each of the other 2 groups showed statistically significant results ( P < 0.001). Indocyanine green indicated no blood flow at the superior 1/4 part. Lead-oxide gel and histology showed that the choke vessels residing along the medioventral line had no significant difference. Choke vessels do not carry blood flow equally. Two categories of choke vessels-"resting" and "active"-are proposed. The "active" form has variable flow carrying capabilities when the flap is harvested in different designs.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleIdentification of Unequal Flow-Carrying Capabilities of Choke Vessels in Rat Abdominal Flaps.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnnals of plastic surgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationPlastic and Reconstructive Surgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Hand Surgery, Ningbo Sixth Hospital, Zhejiang, China..en
dc.identifier.affiliationFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai..en
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SAP.0000000000003300en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid36149984
local.name.researcherNg, Sally
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

16
checked on Nov 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.