Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30952
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSantucci, Jordan-
dc.contributor.authorTacey, Mark A-
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorMichael, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Rachel-
dc.contributor.authorShapiro, Julia-
dc.contributor.authorJennens, Ross-
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Kate-
dc.contributor.authorPattison, Sharon-
dc.contributor.authorBurge, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorZielinski, Rob-
dc.contributor.authorNikfarjam, Mehrdad-
dc.contributor.authorAnanda, Sumitra-
dc.contributor.authorLipton, Lara-
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Belinda-
dc.date2022-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-30T06:17:56Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-30T06:17:56Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Cancer 2022; 174: 102-112en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30952-
dc.description.abstractFirst-line palliative chemotherapy regimens in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have not been compared in head-to-head phase III randomised controlled trials (RCT). Data on optimum first-line treatment and subsequent sequencing is lacking. To compare overall survival (OS) between first-line treatment regimens in a real-world population to determine if an optimal therapeutic sequence is associated with survival benefit. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collated data from the Australasian PURPLE pancreatic cancer registry was undertaken. From 2016 to 2020, of 1551 pancreatic cancer patients, 615 received palliative-intent chemotherapy. Patients with early-stage resected disease without recurrence (n = 369), radiotherapy alone (n = 43), received supportive care alone (n = 458) or had less than 3 months follow-up (n = 66) were excluded. Median OS was comparable between patients receiving first-line Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel (n = 376) and those receiving FOLFIRINOX (n = 73) (11.3 versus 12.3 months, P = 0.37), with 38% proceeding to second-line chemotherapy which was associated with longer mOS compared to first-line treatment alone (17.4 versus 8.2 months, P < 0.001). With second-line treatment following prior FOLFIRINOX (n = 29) or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel (n = 101), mOS did not differ significantly (17.3 versus 15.9 months, P = 0.92), respectively, whilst median progression-free survival was longer with prior FOLFIRINOX (5.2 versus 2.9 months, P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in overall survival between either first-line chemotherapy choice, despite patients receiving FOLFIRINOX being younger, fitter, and more likely to have localised disease. However, FOLFIRINOX was associated with delayed progression. In the absence of phase III RCT data, clinicians should be comfortable using either Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel or FOLFIRINOX as first-line therapy in advanced PDAC.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectFOLFIRINOXen
dc.subjectGemcitabineen
dc.subjectLocally advanceden
dc.subjectMetastaticen
dc.subjectNab-paclitaxelen
dc.subjectPalliative chemotherapyen
dc.subjectPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaen
dc.subjectSurvival analysisen
dc.subjectTreatment sequenceen
dc.titleImpact of first-line FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel chemotherapy on survival in advanced pancreatic cancer: Evidence from the prospective international multicentre PURPLE pancreatic cancer registry.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleEuropean Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)en
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, VIC,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Department of Medical Oncology, Orange and Dubbo Base Hospitals, NSW,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSurgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, VIC,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Department of Surgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, VIC,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Health, VIC,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, VIC,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Department of Medical Oncology, Epworth Health, VIC,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Department of Medicine, Alfred Hospital, VIC,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCabrini Haematology and Oncology Centre, Cabrini Health, VIC,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationWalter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, VIC,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, VIC,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, QLD,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Department of Medical Oncology, Wellington Hospital, New Zealand..en
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Department of Medical Oncology, Dunedin University Hospital, New Zealand..en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.042en
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid35988408
local.name.researcherNikfarjam, Mehrdad
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptRadiation Oncology-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery (University of Melbourne)-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

50
checked on Aug 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.