Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30634
Title: | Clinically Relevant Interactions Between Ritonavir-Boosted Nirmatrelvir and Concomitant Antiseizure Medications: Implications for the Management of COVID-19 in Patients with Epilepsy. | Austin Authors: | Wanounou, Maor;Caraco, Yoseph;Levy, René H;Bialer, Meir;Perucca, Emilio | Affiliation: | Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.. Medicine (University of Melbourne) Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Division of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.. Faculty of Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Institute of Drug Research, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.. Department of Pharmaceutics and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.. David R. Bloom Center for Pharmacy, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.. |
Issue Date: | 27-Jul-2022 | Date: | 2022 | Publication information: | Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2022; 61(9): 1219-1236 | Abstract: | Ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir (RBN) has been authorized recently in several countries as an orally active anti-SARS-CoV-2 treatment for patients at high risk of progressing to severe COVID-19 disease. Nirmatrelvir is the active component against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, whereas ritonavir, a potent CYP3A inhibitor, is intended to boost the activity of nirmatrelvir by increasing its concentration in plasma to ensure persistence of antiviral concentrations during the 12-hour dosing interval. RBN is involved in many clinically important drug-drug interactions both as perpetrator and as victim, which can complicate its use in patients treated with antiseizure medications (ASMs). Interactions between RBN and ASMs are bidirectional. As perpetrator, RBN may increase the plasma concentration of a number of ASMs that are CYP3A4 substrates, possibly leading to toxicity. As victims, both nirmatrelvir and ritonavir are subject to metabolic induction by concomitant treatment with potent enzyme-inducing ASMs (carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and primidone). According to US and European prescribing information, treatment with these ASMs is a contraindication to the use of RBN. Although remdesivir is a valuable alternative to RBN, it may not be readily accessible in some settings due to cost and/or need for intravenous administration. If remdesivir is not an appropriate option, either bebtelovimab or molnupiravir may be considered. However, evidence about the clinical efficacy of bebtelovimab is still limited, and molnupiravir, the only orally active alternative, is deemed to have appreciably lower efficacy than RBN and remdesivir. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30634 | DOI: | 10.1007/s40262-022-01152-z | ORCID: | http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2046-4171 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7855-7066 |
Journal: | Clinical pharmacokinetics | PubMed URL: | 35895276 | PubMed URL: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35895276/ | Type: | Journal Article |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.