Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30515
Title: Contributions to expenditure in endoscopic stone management: a costly process.
Austin Authors: Mondschein, Romy;Bolton, Damien M ;Tan, Sarah;Vu, Minh Hang;McCahy, Philip
Affiliation: School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia..
Urology
Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia..
Department of Surgery (Urology), Monash Health, Berwick, VIC, Australia..
Issue Date: 8-Jul-2022
Date: 2022
Publication information: Urolithiasis 2022; 50(5): 619-624
Abstract: No comprehensive cost estimates exist for performing ureteropyeloscopy (URS), which is increasingly utilised as a treatment of upper tract urolithiasis in Australia. To estimate expenditure associated with URS in an Australian public hospital setting and determine factors contributing to increased cost. Patients who underwent flexible URS for urolithiasis over a 2-year period at a Victorian public health site were included. Data describing demographics, stone factors, disposable equipment and admission length were retrospectively collected. Procedures were performed using reusable flexible scopes. Previously validated costing models for cystoscopic stent extraction, theatre and recovery per hour and ward admission were used to attach cost to individual episodes. The cost of emergency stent insertion was beyond the scope of this study. 222 patients underwent URS; the combined total number of procedures was 539, comprising 202 stent extractions and 115 stent insertions in addition to 222 URS. Mean procedural cost was $2885 (range $1380-$4900). Mean episode cost excluding emergency stent insertion was $3510 (range $1555-$7140). A combination of flexible scopes, operative time and disposable equipment accounted for nearly 90% of the total procedural cost. Significant cost is associated with URS for treatment of renal and ureteric stones. A large burden of the cost is time in theatre, equipment and the need for multiple associated procedures per episode. Utilising other available treatments such as extracorporeal shockwave therapy (SWL) where appropriate may reduce the financial burden of URS and associated procedures.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30515
DOI: 10.1007/s00240-022-01344-z
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4231-414X
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5145-6783
Journal: Urolithiasis
PubMed URL: 35802151
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35802151/
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Cost
Laser-lithotripsy
Ureteropyeloscopy
Urolithiasis
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

28
checked on Oct 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.