Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30444
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJoshi, Esha-
dc.contributor.authorMann, Jennifer M-
dc.contributor.authorGoodwin, Maureen E-
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Allison L-
dc.contributor.authorAtkins, Naomi E-
dc.contributor.authorKhor, Yet Hong-
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Christine F-
dc.date2022-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-29T04:15:33Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-29T04:15:33Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-
dc.identifier.citationRespiratory Care 2022; 67(7): 801-806en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30444-
dc.description.abstractPulse oximeters are often used at home by patients with chronic respiratory diseases and more recently for remote monitoring of patients with COVID-19. There are no published data outside a supervised telemedicine setting regarding patients' experiences with these devices. Our objective was to explore patients' usage patterns and perceptions of using pulse oximetry at home. Patients with chronic respiratory disease who had a pulse oximeter at home were recruited to complete a structured survey. Thirty participants with a range of chronic respiratory diseases (mean age 71 y, 16 females) were recruited. Most participants (83%) used home oxygen therapy. Pulse oximeters were bought online (46.7%), at a pharmacy (40%), at a medical equipment store (6.7%), through a clinic (3.3%), or from an oxygen supplier (3.3%). Use was self-initiated in 56.7% of cases and was based on a health care-related recommendation in 26.7% of cases. Sixty percent of participants used the oximeter daily, with 90% expressing confidence in interpreting their oximeter readings primarily due to education from health care professionals and in-patient experiences. Almost all participants adjusted their activity levels or management based upon oximeter readings. Most participants reported that using a pulse oximeter at home was helpful in judging their physical limitations and provided reassurance and confidence in their disease management. Subjects appeared confident in their use of home pulse oximetry. Health professionals should identify patients who use pulse oximeters for monitoring and ensure that they are able to interpret readings correctly and, if appropriate, adjust management safely.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectCOPDen
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectmonitoringen
dc.subjectoxygenen
dc.subjectpulse oximetryen
dc.subjectquality of lifeen
dc.titlePerceptions of Individuals With Chronic Lung Disease on Home Use of Pulse Oximetry.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleRespiratory careen
dc.identifier.affiliationRespiratory and Sleep Medicineen
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Breathing and Sleepen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Northern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35504723/en
dc.identifier.doi10.4187/respcare.09708en
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5078-809Xen
dc.identifier.pubmedid35504723-
local.name.researcherAtkins, Naomi E
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptRespiratory and Sleep Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptRespiratory and Sleep Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

66
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.