Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30388
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHodgson, Carol L-
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, Alisa M-
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Jonathon-
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldo-
dc.contributor.authorCooper, D James-
dc.contributor.authorGabbe, Belinda J-
dc.contributor.authorIwashyna, Theodore-
dc.contributor.authorLinke, Natalie-
dc.contributor.authorMyles, Paul S-
dc.contributor.authorPaton, Michelle-
dc.contributor.authorPhilpot, Steve-
dc.contributor.authorShulman, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Meredith-
dc.contributor.authorSerpa Neto, Ary-
dc.date2022-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-23T00:40:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-23T00:40:37Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-13-
dc.identifier.citationCritical care (London, England) 2022; 26(1): 174en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30388-
dc.description.abstractData on long-term outcomes after sepsis-associated critical illness have mostly come from small cohort studies, with no information about the incidence of new disability. We investigated whether sepsis-associated critical illness was independently associated with new disability at 6 months after ICU admission compared with other types of critical illness. We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study in six metropolitan intensive care units in Australia. Adult patients were eligible if they had been admitted to the ICU and received more than 24 h of mechanical ventilation. There was no intervention. The primary outcome was new disability measured with the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) 12 level score compared between baseline and 6 months. Between enrollment and follow-up at 6 months, 222/888 (25%) patients died, 100 (35.5%) with sepsis and 122 (20.1%) without sepsis (P < 0.001). Among survivors, there was no difference for the incidence of new disability at 6 months with or without sepsis, 42/106 (39.6%) and 106/300 (35.3%) (RD, 0.00 (- 10.29 to 10.40), P = 0.995), respectively. In addition, there was no difference in the severity of disability, health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression, post-traumatic stress, return to work, financial distress or cognitive function. Compared to mechanically ventilated patients of similar acuity and length of stay without sepsis, patients with sepsis admitted to ICU have an increased risk of death, but survivors have a similar risk of new disability at 6 months. Trial registration NCT03226912, registered July 24, 2017.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectCritical illnessen
dc.subjectDisabilityen
dc.subjectIntensive careen
dc.subjectMechanical ventilationen
dc.subjectRecoveryen
dc.subjectSepsisen
dc.titleComparison of 6-month outcomes of sepsis versus non-sepsis critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleCritical care (London, England)en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Physiotherapy, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Unit, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Careen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Unit, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA..en
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA..en
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35698201/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13054-022-04041-wen
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9002-2075en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1650-8939en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5872-9051en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1520-9387en
dc.identifier.pubmedid35698201
local.name.researcherBellomo, Rinaldo
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.