Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30247
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPritchard, Alexander Lm-
dc.contributor.authorChin, Ken Lee-
dc.contributor.authorStory, David A-
dc.contributor.authorSmart, Philip J-
dc.contributor.authorJones, Daryl A-
dc.contributor.authorSee, Emily J-
dc.contributor.authorNazareth, Justin M-
dc.date2022-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-23T00:31:27Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-23T00:31:27Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-22-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Critical Care : Official Journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses 2022; online first: 22 Mayen
dc.identifier.issn1036-7314
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30247-
dc.description.abstractClinical deterioration requiring rapid response team (RRT) review is associated with increased morbidity amongst hospitalised patients. The frequency of and association with RRT calls in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery is unknown. Understanding the epidemiology of RRT calls might identify areas for quality improvement in this cohort. The objective of this study is to identify perioperative risks and outcome associations with RRT review following major gastrointestinal surgery. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic databases at a large Australian university hospital. We included adult patients admitted for major gastrointestinal surgery between 1 January 2015 and 31 March 2018. Of 7158 patients, 514 (7.4%) required RRT activation postoperatively. After adjustment, variables associated with RRT activation included the following: hemiplegia/paraplegia (odds ratio [OR]: 8.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3 to 27.8, p = 0.001), heart failure (OR: 6.9, 95% CI: 3.3 to 14.6, p < 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (OR: 5.3, 95% CI: 2.7 to 10.4, p < 0.001), peptic ulcer disease (OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 2.2 to 8.0, p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 4.0, 95% CI: 2.2 to 7.2, p < 0.001), and emergency admission status (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 2.1 to 3.3, p < 0.001). Following the index operation, 46% of first RRT activations occurred within 24 h of surgery and 61% had occurred within 48 h. The most common triggers for RRT activation were tachycardia, hypotension, and tachypnoea. Postoperative RRT activation was associated with in-hospital mortality (OR: 6.7, 95% CI: 3.8 to 11.8, p < 0.001), critical care admission (incidence rate ratio: 8.18, 95% CI: 5.23 to 12.77, p < 0.001), and longer median length of hospital stay (12 days vs. 2 days, p < 0.001) compared to no RRT activation. After major gastrointestinal surgery, one in 14 patients had an RRT activation, almost half within 24 h of surgery. Such activation was independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Identified associations may guide more pre-emptive management for those at an increased risk of RRT activation.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectClinical deteriorationen
dc.subjectFailure to rescueen
dc.subjectMedical emergency teamen
dc.subjectPostoperative complicationen
dc.subjectRapid response teamen
dc.titleThe epidemiology of rapid response team activation amongst patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAustralian Critical Care : Official Journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nursesen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Healthen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationMelbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationCCRE Therapeutics, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Integrated Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationMelbourne Academic Centre for Health, Melbourne, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationGeneral Surgery and Gastroenterology Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Australia..en
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35613982/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aucc.2022.04.003en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6479-1310en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3313-7092en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6446-3595en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4436-4319en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9678-5206en
dc.identifier.pubmedid35613982
local.name.researcherJones, Daryl A
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptAnaesthesia-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

48
checked on Aug 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.