Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/29602
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorParatz, Elizabeth D-
dc.contributor.authorBlock, Tomasz J-
dc.contributor.authorStub, Dion A-
dc.contributor.authorLa Gerche, Andre-
dc.contributor.authorKistler, Peter M-
dc.contributor.authorKalman, Jonathan M-
dc.contributor.authorStrathmore, Neil-
dc.contributor.authorMond, Harry-
dc.contributor.authorWoodford, Noel W F-
dc.contributor.authorBurke, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorVoskoboinik, Aleksandr-
dc.date2021-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-31T22:49:34Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-31T22:49:34Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationJACC. Clinical electrophysiology 2022; 8(3): 356-366en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/29602-
dc.description.abstractThis study sought to define the feasibility and utility of postmortem cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) interrogation. The diagnostic yield of routine postmortem interrogation of CIEDs including pacemakers, defibrillators, and implantable loop recorders has not been established. The study reviewed all CIED interrogations in deceased individuals undergoing medicolegal investigation of sudden or unexplained death by the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine between 2005 and 2020. A total of 260 patients (68.8% male, median age 72.8 years [interquartile range: 62.7-82.2 years]) underwent CIED interrogation (202 pacemakers, 56 defibrillators, and 2 loop recorders) for investigation of sudden (n = 162) or unexplained (n = 98) death. CIEDs were implanted for median of 2.0 years (interquartile range: 0.7-5.0 years), with 19 devices at elective replacement indicator and 5 at end of life. Interrogation was successful in 256 (98.5%) cases. Potential CIED malfunction was identified in 20 (7.7%) cases, including untreated ventricular arrhythmias (n = 13) and lead failures (n = 3, 2 resulting in untreated ventricular arrhythmia). Interrogation directly informed cause of death in 131 (50.4%) cases. A total of 72 (27.7%) patients had abnormalities recorded in 30 days preceding death: nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (n = 26), rapid atrial fibrillation (n = 17), elective replacement indicator or end-of-life status (n = 22), intrathoracic impedance alarms (n = 3), lead issues (n = 3), or therapy delivered (n = 1). In 6 cases in which the patient was found deceased after a prolonged period, interrogation determined time of death. In 1 case, CIED interrogation was the primary means of patient identification. Postmortem CIED interrogation frequently contributes important information regarding critical device malfunction, premortem abnormalities, mechanism, and time of death or patient identity. Device interrogation should be considered for select patients with CIEDs undergoing autopsy.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectcardiac implantable electronic deviceen
dc.subjectforensicen
dc.subjectpacemakeren
dc.subjectpostmortemen
dc.titlePostmortem Interrogation of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A 15-Year Experience.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJACC. Clinical electrophysiologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationGeneral Medicineen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Diabetes, Central Clinical School, Monash University, the Alfred Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiology, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Prahran, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal Melbourne Hospital Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationVictorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Southbank, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35331431/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacep.2021.10.011en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid35331431-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Jan 8, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.