Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28895
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorvan Diepen, Sean-
dc.contributor.authorCoulson, Tim G-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xiaoming-
dc.contributor.authorOpgenorth, Dawn-
dc.contributor.authorZuege, Danny J-
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Jo-
dc.contributor.authorAgyemang, Malik-
dc.contributor.authorNiven, Daniel J-
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldo-
dc.contributor.authorWright, Stephen E-
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Paul J-
dc.contributor.authorBagshaw, Sean M-
dc.date2022-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-01T04:43:45Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-01T04:43:45Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-25-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery :2022; 62(2)en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28895-
dc.description.abstractThe comparative effectiveness and safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) versus histamine-2 receptor blockers for stress ulcer prophylaxis in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit population is uncertain. Although the Proton Pump Inhibitors versus Histamine-2 Receptor Blockers for Ulcer Prophylaxis Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit (PEPTIC) trial reported a higher risk of mortality in the PPI arm with no difference in gastrointestinal bleeding, detailed information on surgical variables and clinically relevant surgical subgroups was not available. The analysis included all Canadian cardiac surgery patients enrolled in the PEPTIC trial. Data were electronically linked using unique patient identifiers to a clinical information system. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, gastrointestinal bleeding, Clostridium difficile infections, ventilator-associated conditions and length of stay. We studied 823 (50.6%) randomized to PPIs and 805 (49.4%) to histamine-2-receptor blockers. In the intention-to-treat analysis, there were no differences in hospital mortality [PPI: 4.3% vs histamine-2 receptor blockers: 4.8%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-1.70], gastrointestinal bleeding (3.9% vs 4.8%, aOR 1.09, 95% CI 0.66-1.81), C. difficile infections (0.9% vs 0.1%, aOR 0.18, 95% CI 0.02-1.59), ventilator-associated conditions (1.6% vs 1.7%, aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-1.00) or median length of stay (9.2 vs 9.8 days, adjusted risk ratio 1.06, 85% CI 0.99-1.13). No significant treatment differences were observed among subgroups of interest or per-protocol populations. In a secondary analysis of cardiac surgery patients enrolled in the PEPTIC trial in Canada, no differences in effectiveness or safety were observed between use of PPIs and histamine-2 receptor blockers for stress ulcer prophylaxis. anzctr.org.au identifier: ACTRN12616000481471.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectClostridium difficile infectionsen
dc.subjectCardiac surgical intensive care uniten
dc.subjectGastrointestinal bleedingen
dc.subjectStress ulcer prophylaxisen
dc.subjectVentilator-associated conditionsen
dc.titleEfficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors versus histamine-2 receptor blockers in the cardiac surgical population: insights from the PEPTIC trial.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centreen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada..en
dc.identifier.affiliationCritical Care Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand..en
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Unit, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK..en
dc.identifier.affiliationHealth Services Statistical and Analytic Methods, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada..en
dc.identifier.affiliationeCritical Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada..en
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35213716/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejcts/ezac124en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6688-828Xen
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3571-3871en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9527-0577en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1650-8939en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3633-6596en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6182-268Xen
dc.identifier.pubmedid35213716-
local.name.researcherBellomo, Rinaldo
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptAnaesthesia-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

60
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.