Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28768
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChazan, Grace-
dc.contributor.authorAnton, Angelyn-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Shirley-
dc.contributor.authorShapiro, Julia-
dc.contributor.authorWeickhardt, Andrew J-
dc.contributor.authorAzad, Arun-
dc.contributor.authorKwan, Edmond M-
dc.contributor.authorSpain, Lavinia-
dc.contributor.authorGunjur, Ashray-
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorParente, Phillip-
dc.contributor.authorParnis, Francis-
dc.contributor.authorGoh, Jeffrey-
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorTran, Ben-
dc.date2022-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-11T03:20:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-11T03:20:01Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-30-
dc.identifier.citationAsia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology 2022; 18(6)en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28768-
dc.description.abstractMultiple life-prolonging therapies are available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, the optimal treatment strategy following progression through standard treatment with docetaxel, androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) and cabazitaxel, remains unclear. We aimed to describe treatment patterns in men with mCRPC following progression on standard treatments and determine whether subsequent treatment choice impacts overall survival. Clinicopathologic and treatment data were extracted from the electronic CRPC Australian Database (ePAD) for patients who had received docetaxel, ARSIs and cabazitaxel in any order. Data were analyzed to compare groups that did versus did not receive subsequent systemic therapy. Treatment sequences, median duration of treatment, and median overall survival (mOS) were reported for each treatment group. Ninety-eight eligible patients were identified, with 51 receiving subsequent systemic therapy. Those who received further treatment were younger (68 vs. 71 years, p < .01) but did not have any other differences in clinicopathologic features compared to those who received no further treatment. Patients who received upfront docetaxel were more likely to proceed to subsequent treatment (p = .02). Subsequent systemic therapies varied, the most common being carboplatin-based regimens (n = 13, 25.5%) and many patients were rechallenged with ARSI (n = 10, 19.6%) or docetaxel (n = 6, 11.8%). There was no difference in mOS according to subsequent systemic therapy (p = .09). This retrospective multicenter analysis demonstrates the variation in treatment sequences used for mCRPC in the real-world setting. In the absence of high quality, prospective evidence, our results suggest that subsequent treatment choice does not influence survival outcomes and the optimal choice is guided by individual patient and disease-related factors.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectadvanceden
dc.subjectcabazitaxelen
dc.subjectmetastatic castration-resistant prostate canceren
dc.subjecttreatment sequenceen
dc.titleBeyond cabazitaxel: Late line treatments in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: A retrospective multicentre analysis.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAsia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centreen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAdelaide Cancer Centre, Adelaide, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationEastern Health, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationWestern Health, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationGoulburn Valley Health, Shepparton, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationWalter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35098653/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajco.13732en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9713-1872en
dc.identifier.pubmedid35098653-
local.name.researcherGunjur, Ashray
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute-
crisitem.author.deptMedical Oncology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

52
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.