Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28756
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJanssen, Heidi-
dc.contributor.authorBird, Marie-Louise-
dc.contributor.authorLuker, Julie-
dc.contributor.authorSellar, Ben-
dc.contributor.authorBerndt, Angela-
dc.contributor.authorAshby, Samantha-
dc.contributor.authorMcCluskey, Annie-
dc.contributor.authorAda, Louise-
dc.contributor.authorBlennerhassett, Jannette M-
dc.contributor.authorBernhardt, Julie-
dc.contributor.authorSpratt, Neil J-
dc.date2022-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-11T03:19:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-11T03:19:44Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-03-
dc.identifier.citationDisability and rehabilitation 2022: 1-6en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28756-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to investigate rehabilitation staff perceptions of factors influencing stroke survivor activity outside of dedicated therapy time for the purpose of supporting successful translation of activity promoting interventions in a rehabilitation unit. Purposive sampling of multi-disciplinary teams from four rehabilitation units was performed, and semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone, digitally audio-recorded and then transcribed verbatim. A stepped iterative process of thematic analysis was employed until data saturation was reached. All but one of the 22 participants were female, the majority were either physiotherapists or occupational therapists, with a median of 4 years (interquartile range, 2-10) working at their respective rehabilitation units. Analysis of the data revealed three themes: (i) stroke survivor characteristics influence their activity outside therapy, (ii) the rehabilitation environment influences physical, cognitive, and social activity, and (iii) institutional priorities, staff culture, and attitude can be barriers to activity. Rehabilitation units were perceived to be unstimulating, and visitors considered enablers of activity when resources were perceived to be scarce. Our results suggest careful consideration of the involvement of visitors, an individual's needs and preferences, and the institution's priorities and staff attitude may result in greater stroke survivor activity during rehabilitation.Implications for rehabilitationStaff should consider stroke survivor impairments and a rehabilitation unit's institutional priorities and staff attitudes when aiming to enhance stroke survivor engagement in activity.The physical and social environment of a rehabilitation unit can be optimised by rehabilitation staff to promote activity.Utilisation of visitors of stroke survivors on a rehabilitation unit may be one way to enhance engagement in activity.Discussion within the rehabilitation team concerning "ownership" of the role of supporting stroke survivor activity outside of structured therapy time may support better engagement in same.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectStrokeen
dc.subjectactivityen
dc.subjectbarriersen
dc.subjectenvironmenten
dc.subjectqualitativeen
dc.subjectrehabilitationen
dc.titleImpairments, and physical design and culture of a rehabilitation unit influence stroke survivor activity: qualitative analysis of rehabilitation staff perceptions.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleDisability and rehabilitationen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health..en
dc.identifier.affiliationPhysiotherapy..en
dc.identifier.affiliationOccupational Therapy Australia (OTA), Fitzroy, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationInternational Centre for Allied Health Evidence (iCAHE), Adelaide, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationHunter Medical Research Institute and Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton Heights, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle and Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton Heights, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationAllied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationThe StrokeEd Collaboration, Sydney, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09638288.2021.2019840en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5217-0242en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9719-6657en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1369-5721en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9883-047Xen
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2787-8484en
dc.identifier.pubmedid35113761
local.name.researcherBlennerhassett, Jannette M
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.