Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28547
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Simone-
dc.contributor.authorMcTier, Lauren-
dc.contributor.authorWhitehead, Christina-
dc.contributor.authorMasters, Kristy-
dc.contributor.authorWynne, Rochelle-
dc.date2022-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-10T04:56:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-10T04:56:01Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Critical Care 2023; 36(2)en
dc.identifier.issn1036-7314-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28547-
dc.description.abstractMucosal pressure injuries (PIs) are usually caused by pressure from essential medical devices. There is no universally accepted criterion for assessment, monitoring, or reporting mucosal PI. Reliable descriptors are vital to benchmark the frequency and severity of this hospital-acquired complication. The objective of this study was to determine whether modified Reaper Oral Mucosa Pressure Injury Scale (ROMPIS) descriptors improved the reliability of mucosal PI assessment. Secondary aims were to explore nurses' knowledge of and attitudes toward mucosal PI. A prospective cross-sectional survey was distributed to nurses from two tertiary affiliated intensive care units via REDCap® to capture demographic data, knowledge, attitudes, and inter-rater reliability (IRR) measures. Nurses were randomised at a 1:1 ratio to original or modified ROMPIS descriptors and classified 12 images of mucosal PI. IRR was assessed using percentage agreement, Fleiss' kappa, and intraclass correlation coefficients. The survey response rate was 20.9% (n = 98/468), with 73.5% (n = 72/98) completing IRR measures. Agreement was higher with modified (75%) than original ROMPIS descriptors (69.4%). IRR was fair for the original (κ = 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.28, 0.33], z 26.5, p < 0.001) and modified ROMPIS (κ = 0.29, 95% CI [0.26, 0.31], z 25.0, p < 0.001). Intraclass correlation coefficient findings indicated ratings were inconsistent for the original (0.33, 95% CI [0.18, 0.59], F 18.8 (11 df), p < 0.001) and modified ROMPIS (0.31, 95% CI [0.17, 0.57], F 17.6 (11 df), p < 0.001). PI-specific education and risk factor recognition were common. Modified descriptors had marginally better agreement. Participants understand management and prevention but need to strengthen their perceived capacity for mucosal PI risk assessment. This work provides a foundation for future benchmarking and a platform from which further research to refine and test descriptors specific to mucosal PI can be generated.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectCritical careen
dc.subjectCritical care nursingen
dc.subjectNursing researchen
dc.subjectPressure ulcer classificationen
dc.subjectPressure ulcer nursingen
dc.subjectPressure ulcer prevention and controlen
dc.subjectQuality of health careen
dc.titleInter-rater reliability of descriptors for the classification of mucosal pressure injury: A prospective cross-sectional study.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAustralian Critical Care : Official Journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nursesen
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Careen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationWestern Sydney Nursing & Midwifery Research Centre, Blacktown Clinical & Research School, Western Sydney University & Western Sydney Local Health District, Blacktown Hospital, Marcel Crescent Blacktown, NSW, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Quality & Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Unit, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, Australiaen
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34991951/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aucc.2021.12.004en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5642-1205en
dc.identifier.pubmedid34991951-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

18
checked on May 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.