Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27710
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Yee-Ming Melody-
dc.contributor.authorHamnvik, Ole-Petter Riksfjord-
dc.date2021-10-04-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-11T04:12:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-11T04:12:45Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10-04-
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Osteoporosis 2021; 16(1): 149en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27710-
dc.description.abstractTeriparatide is a highly effective anabolic therapy for use in patients with osteoporosis at elevated fracture risk but carries a warning about an increased risk of osteosarcoma based on findings from pre-approval animal studies. Since approval, follow-up of individuals treated with teriparatide has not shown an increased risk of osteosarcoma, but it is still recommended to avoid teriparatide in patients with risk factors for osteosarcoma. One such risk factor is radiotherapy; deciding whether to use teriparatide therapy in patients at high risk of fracture but with a history of radiotherapy is therefore a frequent clinical problem. We sought to identify whether clinicians are using teriparatide in patients with a history of radiotherapy despite the warning and to explore the rationale for this choice. Herein, we describe six cases where the likelihood of fracture, osteosarcoma, and the benefits of teriparatide treatment are assessed to determine the appropriateness of prescribing teriparatide in the setting of prior or concurrent radiotherapy. All six patients had severe osteoporosis with limited treatment options. For those who completed 2 years of teriparatide, no further fractures during the follow-up period have occurred, and improvements in bone density (as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) were observed. Despite radiotherapy being a relative contraindication to teriparatide use, there may be a role for teriparatide in select cases where osteoporosis is complex and severe and where other treatment options are not suitable or have been exhausted. The risks vs. benefits of prescribing teriparatide in this population should always be carefully considered, and both the patient and treating oncologist should be educated on the potential risk of osteosarcoma development when teriparatide is continued during radiotherapy.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectOsteosarcomaen
dc.subjectPTH analogueen
dc.subjectRadiation therapyen
dc.subjectRadiotherapyen
dc.subjectTeriparatideen
dc.titleTeriparatide in individuals with a prior history of radiation therapy-a case series.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleArchives of Osteoporosisen
dc.identifier.affiliationMedicine (University of Melbourne)en
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Ave, RFB-2, Boston, MA, 02115, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationEndocrinologyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11657-021-01007-3en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid34608566
local.name.researcherCheung, Yee-Ming Melody
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptEndocrinology-
crisitem.author.deptMedicine (University of Melbourne)-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

46
checked on Nov 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.