Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27708
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGawthorne, Julie-
dc.contributor.authorFasugba, Oyebola-
dc.contributor.authorLevi, Chris-
dc.contributor.authorMcInnes, Elizabeth-
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, Caleb-
dc.contributor.authorMcNeil, John-
dc.contributor.authorCadilhac, Dominique A-
dc.contributor.authorEverett, Bronwyn-
dc.contributor.authorFernandez, Ritin-
dc.contributor.authorFry, Margaret-
dc.contributor.authorGoldsmith, Helen-
dc.contributor.authorHickman, Louise-
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Deborah-
dc.contributor.authorMaguire, Jane-
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Edel-
dc.contributor.authorPerry, Lin-
dc.contributor.authorMiddleton, Sandy-
dc.date2021-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-11T04:12:44Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-11T04:12:44Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10-20-
dc.identifier.citationInternational journal for quality in health care 2021; 33(4): mzab141en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27708-
dc.description.abstractClinical registry participation is a measure of healthcare quality. Limited knowledge exists on Australian hospitals participation in clinical registries and whether this registry data informs quality improvement initiatives. Hence, our study aimed to; identify participation in clinical registries; determine if registry data inform quality improvement initiatives; identify registry participation enablers; and clinicians' educational needs to improve use of registry data to drive practice change. : A self-administered survey was distributed to staff coordinating registries in seven hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Eligible registries were international, national and state-based clinical, condition/disease-specific and device/product registries. : Response rate was 70% (97/139). Sixty-two (64%) respondents contributed data to 46 eligible registries. Registry reports were most often received by nurses (61%) and infrequently by hospital executives (8.4%). Less than half used registry data 'always' or 'often' to influence practice improvement (48%) and care pathways (49%). Protected time for data collection (87%) and benchmarking (79%) were 'very likely' or 'likely' to promote continued participation. Over half 'strongly agreed' or 'agreed' that clinical practice improvement training (79%) and evidence-practice gap identification (77%) would optimise use of registry data. : Registry data are generally only visible to local speciality units and not routinely used to inform quality improvement. Centralised on-going registry funding, accessible and transparent integrated information systems, combined with data informed improvement science education could be first steps to promote quality data-driven clinical improvement initiatives.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleAre Clinicians Using Routinely Collected Data to Drive Practice Improvement? A Cross Sectional Survey.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternational journal for quality in health careen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney, New South Wales, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationNursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Network Sydney, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne..en
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian Catholic University, New South Wales, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationTranslational Public Health and Evaluation Division, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, New South Wales, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Applied Nursing Research, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSt Vincent's Health Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSouth East Sydney Local Health District, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationWestern Sydney Nursing & Midwifery Research Centre, Western Sydney Local Health District, Western Sydney University, New South Wales, Australia..en
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34613386/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/intqhc/mzab141en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2417-2216en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1265-7096en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8162-682Xen
dc.identifier.pubmedid34613386
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

24
checked on Dec 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.