Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27373
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Katie-
dc.contributor.authorJiarpakdee, Jirayus-
dc.contributor.authorLoupis, Anne-
dc.contributor.authorTantithamthavorn, Chakkrit-
dc.contributor.authorJoe, Keith-
dc.contributor.authorBen-Meir, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorAkhlaghi, Hamed-
dc.contributor.authorHutton, Jennie-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Wei-
dc.contributor.authorStephenson, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorBlecher, Gabriel-
dc.contributor.authorPaul, Buntine-
dc.contributor.authorSweeny, Amy-
dc.contributor.authorTurhan, Burak-
dc.date2021-08-25-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-30T05:31:01Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-30T05:31:01Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-
dc.identifier.citationEmergency medicine journal : EMJ 2022; 39(5): 386-393en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27373-
dc.description.abstractPatients, families and community members would like emergency department wait time visibility. This would improve patient journeys through emergency medicine. The study objective was to derive, internally and externally validate machine learning models to predict emergency patient wait times that are applicable to a wide variety of emergency departments. Twelve emergency departments provided 3 years of retrospective administrative data from Australia (2017-2019). Descriptive and exploratory analyses were undertaken on the datasets. Statistical and machine learning models were developed to predict wait times at each site and were internally and externally validated. Model performance was tested on COVID-19 period data (January to June 2020). There were 1 930 609 patient episodes analysed and median site wait times varied from 24 to 54 min. Individual site model prediction median absolute errors varied from±22.6 min (95% CI 22.4 to 22.9) to ±44.0 min (95% CI 43.4 to 44.4). Global model prediction median absolute errors varied from ±33.9 min (95% CI 33.4 to 34.0) to ±43.8 min (95% CI 43.7 to 43.9). Random forest and linear regression models performed the best, rolling average models underestimated wait times. Important variables were triage category, last-k patient average wait time and arrival time. Wait time prediction models are not transferable across hospitals. Models performed well during the COVID-19 lockdown period. Electronic emergency demographic and flow information can be used to approximate emergency patient wait times. A general model is less accurate if applied without site-specific factors.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectefficiencyen
dc.subjectemergency care systemsen
dc.subjectemergency department managementen
dc.subjectemergency department operationsen
dc.subjectemergency department utilisationen
dc.subjectemergency departmentsen
dc.titleEmergency medicine patient wait time multivariable prediction models: a multicentre derivation and validation study.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleEmergency Medicine Journal : EMJen
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu, Pohjois-⁠Pohjanmaa, Finlanden
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationEmergency Medicine, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationEmergency, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationGriffith University School of Medicine, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationBiostatistics, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAmbulance Victoria, Doncaster, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCommunity Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationEmergency Department, Casey Hospital, Berwick, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationHealth Services, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationEmergency Department, Cabrini Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Software Systems and Cybersecurity, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMADA, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationEmergencyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Emergency Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMedicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationEmergency Program, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/emermed-2020-211000en
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5313-5852en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8537-2011en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8392-5612en
dc.identifier.pubmedid34433615-
local.name.researcherBen-Meir, Michael
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptEmergency-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

52
checked on Nov 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.