Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27149
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDetering, Karen M-
dc.contributor.authorSellars, Marcus-
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Helana-
dc.contributor.authorClayton, Josephine M-
dc.contributor.authorBuck, Kim-
dc.contributor.authorNolte, Linda-
dc.date2020-07-29-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-02T05:47:55Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-02T05:47:55Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Geriatric Oncology 2021; 12(2): 274-281en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27149-
dc.description.abstractAdvance care planning (ACP) and completion advance care directives (ACDs) is recommended for patients with cancer. Documentation needs to be available at the point of care. To describe the prevalence of ACDs in health records and the self-reported awareness of and engagement in ACP as reported by older Australians with cancer, and to examine the concordance between self-reported completion of and presence of documentation in participants' health records. Prospective multi-center audit of health records, and a self-report survey of eligible participants in 51 Australian health and residential aged care services. The audit included 458 people aged ≥65 years with cancer. 30% had ≥ ACD located in their record. 218 people were eligible for survey completion; 97 (44% response rate) completed it. Of these, 81% had a preference to limit some/all treatments, 10% wanted to defer decision-making to someone else, and 9% wanted all treatments. Fifty-eight percent of survey completers reported having completed an ACP document. Concordance between documentation in the participant's record and self-report of completion was 61% (k = 0.269), which is only fair agreement. Whilst 30% of participants had at least one ACD in their record, 58% self-reported document completion, and concordance between self-reported completion and presence in records was only fair. This is significant given most people had a preference for some/all limitation of treatment. Further ACP implementation strategies are required. These include a systematic approach to embedding ACP into routine care, workforce education, increasing community awareness, and looking at e-health solutions to improve accessibility at the point of care.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAdvance care directivesen
dc.subjectAdvance care planningen
dc.subjectCanceren
dc.subjectEnd of life careen
dc.subjectGeriatric oncologyen
dc.subjectOncologyen
dc.titlePrevalence of advance care planning documentation and self-reported uptake in older Australians with a cancer diagnosis.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Geriatric Oncologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Health, Arts and Innovation, Swinburne University, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAdvance Care Planningen
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Learning & Research in Palliative Care, HammondCare, Greenwich Hospital, Sydney, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jgo.2020.07.012en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid32739354-
local.name.researcherDetering, Karen M
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptAdvance Care Planning-
crisitem.author.deptAdvance Care Planning-
crisitem.author.deptAdvance Care Planning-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on Nov 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.