Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26554
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Ruth S-
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Barbara J-
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, Anastasia-
dc.contributor.authorYates, Paul A-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Wen Kwang-
dc.date2021-05-19-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-24T05:45:02Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-24T05:45:02Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationInternal Medicine Journal 2022; 52(5): 776-784en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26554-
dc.description.abstractAdvance Care Planning (ACP) is a process by which people communicate their healthcare preferences and values, planning for a time when they are unable to voice them. Within Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACF) both the completion and the clarity of ACP documents is variable and, internationally, medical treatment orders have been used to address these issues. In this study, Goals of Patient Care (GOPC) medical treatment orders were introduced alongside usual ACP in three RACF to improve healthcare decision-making for residents. This study explored the experiences of RACF healthcare-providers with ACP and GOPC medical treatment orders. The study was of Explanatory Descriptive design. Within three RACF where the GOPC medical treatment orders had been introduced, focus groups and interviews with healthcare-providers were performed. The transcribed interviews were analysed thematically. Healthcare-providers reported support for ACP and GOPC but also discussed many problematic issues. Analysis of the data identified four main themes: Enablers, Barriers, Resident autonomy and Advance documentation (ACP and GOPC). Healthcare-providers identified ACP and GOPC as positive tools for assisting with medical decision-making for residents. Although barriers exist in completion and activation of plans, healthcare-providers described them as progressing resident-centred care. Willingness to follow ACP instructions was reported to be reduced by lack of trust by clinicians. Families were also reported to change their views from those documented in family-completed ACP, attributed to poor understanding of their purpose. Participants reported that GOPC led to clearer documentation of residents' medical treatment-plans than relying on ACP documents alone. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAdvance Care Planningen
dc.subjectGoals of Careen
dc.subjectMedical Treatment Ordersen
dc.subjectResidential Aged Care Facilitiesen
dc.titleHealthcare-providers experiences with Advance Care Planning and Goals of Patient Care medical treatment orders in Residential Aged Care Facilities; an explanatory descriptive study.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternal Medicine Journalen
dc.identifier.affiliationMelbourne Health, 300 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationNorthern Health, 185 Cooper Street, Epping, Victoria, 3076, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, 1-100 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDeakin University, 75 Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, Geelong, Victoria, 3216, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Healthen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/imj.15374en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4965-7949en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9930-8643en
dc.identifier.pubmedid34008332-
local.name.researcherYates, Paul A
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptAged Care-
crisitem.author.deptGeriatric Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

64
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.