Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26550
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZorron Cheng Tao Pu, Leonardo-
dc.contributor.authorRaval, Manjri-
dc.contributor.authorTerbah, Ryma-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Gurpreet-
dc.contributor.authorRajadurai, Anton-
dc.contributor.authorVaughan, Rhys B-
dc.contributor.authorEfthymiou, Marios-
dc.contributor.authorChandran, Sujievvan-
dc.date2021-05-03-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-24T05:44:59Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-24T05:44:59Z-
dc.date.issued2021-05-03-
dc.identifier.citationJGH Open 2021; 5(5): 542-548en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26550-
dc.description.abstractTelehealth has become the standard of care during the COVID-19 outbreak. This study aimed to assess doctor and patient satisfaction of endoscopy-related telehealth clinics with video consultations. A prospective observational study of patients consecutively booked to attend two endoscopy-related telehealth clinics at an ambulatory tertiary care setting was conducted from July to October 2020. Data collected from our previously published study using phone consultations (data collected in April-May 2020) were used as a control arm. The primary outcome (satisfaction) was assessed through the six-question score (6Q_score) as per previous research. Secondary outcomes included failure-to-attend (FTA) rate and perceived necessity of physical examination/in-person follow-up appointment. There were 962 endoscopy clinic appointments between July and October, of which 157 were conducted through video. Data on 127 doctor questionnaires and 94 patient questionnaires were analyzed. The median age (years) of patients reviewed via video [57, interquartile range (IQR) 48-66] was lower than those reviewed via phone (65, IQR 55-74, P < 0.01). Patient average 6Q_score was higher with video compared to phone (85.1% vs 78.4%, P = 0.01), as was doctors' 6Q_score (97.5% vs 91.9%, P = 0.02). FTA rates remained similar between the two assessments (6.4% in April/May and 4.4% between July/October, P = 0.12). The requirement for in-person follow-up/physical examination was identified in two video consultations (1.6%). Video consultations during the COVID-19 outbreak demonstrated higher patient and doctor satisfaction compared to phone consultations. There was no significant difference in FTA rates and need for in-person follow-up consultations/physical examination between the telehealth two modalities.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectcoronavirusen
dc.subjectoutpatient clinicen
dc.subjecttelehealthen
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.titleVideo consultations during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic are associated with high satisfaction for both doctors and patients.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJGH Openen
dc.identifier.affiliationGastroenterology and Hepatologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jgh3.12547en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7921-5631en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3654-2437en
dc.identifier.pubmedid34013052-
local.name.researcherChandran, Sujievvan
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptGastroenterology and Hepatology-
crisitem.author.deptGeneral Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptGastroenterology and Hepatology-
crisitem.author.deptGastroenterology and Hepatology-
crisitem.author.deptGastroenterology and Hepatology-
crisitem.author.deptGastroenterology and Hepatology-
crisitem.author.deptGastroenterology and Hepatology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

54
checked on Oct 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.