Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26444
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGulhati, Pat-
dc.contributor.authorYin, Jun-
dc.contributor.authorPederson, Levi-
dc.contributor.authorSchmoll, Hans-Joachim-
dc.contributor.authorHoff, Paulo-
dc.contributor.authorDouillard, Jean-Yves-
dc.contributor.authorHecht, J Randolph-
dc.contributor.authorTournigand, Christophe-
dc.contributor.authorTebbutt, Niall C-
dc.contributor.authorChibaudel, Benoist-
dc.contributor.authorGramont, Aimery De-
dc.contributor.authorShi, Qian-
dc.contributor.authorOverman, Michael James-
dc.date2020-11-01-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-10T07:13:33Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-10T07:13:33Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the National Cancer Institute 2020; 112(11): 1127-1136en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26444-
dc.description.abstractCarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are used in conjunction with imaging to monitor response to systemic therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We sought to identify a threshold for CEA change from baseline to predict progressive disease (PD) in mCRC patients receiving first-line therapy. Patients from trials collected in the ARCAD database were included if baseline CEA was at least 10 ng/mL and repeat CEA was available within 14 days of first restaging scan. Optimal cutoffs for CEA change were identified by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Prediction performance of cutoffs was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value. Analyses were conducted by treatment class: chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy with anti-VEGF antibody, and chemotherapy with anti-EGFR antibody. A total of 2643 mCRC patients treated with systemic therapy were included. Median percent change of CEA from baseline to first restaging for patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease (non-PD) and PD was -53.1% and +23.6% for chemotherapy alone (n = 957) and -71.7% and -45.3% for chemotherapy with anti-VEGF antibody (n = 1355). The optimal area under the curve cutoff for differentiating PD from non-PD on first restaging was -7.5% for chemotherapy alone and -62.0% for chemotherapy with anti-VEGF antibody; chemotherapy alone, adjusted odds ratio = 6.51 (95% CI = 3.31 to 12.83, P < .001), chemotherapy with anti-VEGF antibody, adjusted odds ratio = 3.45 (95% CI = 1.93 to 6.18, P < .001). A 99% negative predictive value clinical cutoff for prediction of non-PD would avoid CT scan at first restaging in 21.0% of chemotherapy alone and 16.2% of chemotherapy with anti-VEGF antibody-treated patients. Among patients with stable disease on first restaging, those with decreased CEA from baseline had statistically significantly improved progression-free and overall survival. Change in CEA from baseline to first restaging can accurately predict non-progression and correlates with long-term outcomes in patients receiving systemic chemotherapy.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titleThreshold Change in CEA as a Predictor of Non-Progression to First-Line Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Elevated CEA.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of the National Cancer Instituteen
dc.identifier.affiliationCentro de Oncologia de Brasilia do Sirio Libanes-Unidade Lago Sul, Sao Paulo, Brazilen
dc.identifier.affiliationDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationMedical Oncologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationIntegrated Centres for Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, St-Herblain, Franceen
dc.identifier.affiliationKlinik fur Innere Med IV, University Clinic Halle, Halle, Germanyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationHospital Saint-Antoine, Paris, Franceen
dc.identifier.affiliationFranco-British Institute, Levallois-Peret, Franceen
dc.identifier.affiliationHospital Henri Mondor, Paris, Franceen
dc.identifier.affiliationOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Instituteen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jnci/djaa020en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid32191317-
local.name.researcherTebbutt, Niall C
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptMedical Oncology-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

30
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.