Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26261
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLarach, José Tomás-
dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Julie-
dc.contributor.authorWright, Timothy-
dc.contributor.authorRajkomar, Amrish K S-
dc.contributor.authorMcCormick, Jacob J-
dc.contributor.authorKong, Joseph-
dc.contributor.authorSmart, Philip J-
dc.contributor.authorHeriot, Alexander G-
dc.contributor.authorWarrier, Satish K-
dc.date2021-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-19T05:58:52Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-19T05:58:52Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationSurgical endoscopy 2022; 36(3): 2113-2120en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26261-
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to compare the short-term outcomes of robotic complete mesocolic excision (RCME) versus conventional robotic right colectomy (RRC) for right-sided colon cancer. Consecutive patients who underwent robotic surgery for right-sided colon cancer in a public quaternary and a private tertiary healthcare centre between November 2018 and June 2020 were included. Clinical, perioperative and histopathological variables were collected and analysed. Fifty-one patients were included; 25 (49%) of them had an RCME. The groups were evenly distributed in terms of demographic characteristics and tumour location. Operative time was similar between both groups, and no patients required conversion to open surgery. There were no differences in overall complications (16% in RCME vs. 26.9% in RRC; p = 0.499) or their profile between groups. There were no anastomotic leaks recorded, and the reoperation rates were similar (0% for RCME versus 3.8% for RRC; p = 1). In addition, the median length of hospital stay was similar in between the RCME and the RRC groups (4 [4-6] days versus 5 [3-8.5] days, respectively; p = 0.891). Whilst there were no differences in the TNM staging, the mean number of lymph nodes harvested with RCME was 37.7 (±12.9) compared to 21.8 (±7.5) with RCC (p < 0.001). In our series, RCME was associated with a higher lymph node harvest and a similar morbidity profile compared to RCC. Further studies are required to validate these results and provide long-term oncologic outcomes.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectColon canceren
dc.subjectComplete mesocolic excisionen
dc.subjectD3 lymphadenectomyen
dc.subjectRight hemicolectomyen
dc.subjectRobotic colectomyen
dc.titleRobotic complete mesocolic excision versus conventional robotic right colectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a comparative study of perioperative outcomes.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleSurgical Endoscopyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.en
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationGeneral Surgery and Gastrointestinal Clinical Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSurgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00464-021-08498-8en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5242-9456en
dc.identifier.pubmedid33844084-
local.name.researcherSmart, Philip J
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

80
checked on Apr 3, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.