Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25987
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQu, Liang G-
dc.contributor.authorAdam, Ahmed-
dc.contributor.authorRanasinghe, Weranja-
dc.contributor.authorLawrentschuk, Nathan-
dc.date2019-09-27-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T21:50:03Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-03T21:50:03Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-
dc.identifier.citationWorld Journal of Urology 2020; 38(6): 1413-1422en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25987-
dc.description.abstractUrinary diversion procedures frequently result in bacterial colonisation. There is an increased incidence of developing urinary tract infections (UTIs) in this patient population. Current guidelines, however, recommend against treating this colonisation. This systematic review aimed to determine when and how to test, monitor, and treat bacteriuria in patients with urinary diversion. A systematic search strategy was conducted based on keywords "urinary diversion" and "bacteriuria", on MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar. Articles were screened and included only if they reported on (i) testing methods for bacteriuria, (ii) surveillance of bacteriuria over time, or (iii) when and how to treat bacteriuria. Results were summarised and reported using a narrative synthesis. Altogether, 26 studies were included in this review. Inconsistencies were noted in the definitions of bacteriuria, with most studies reporting bacteriuria as > 104 cfu/mL (8/17 studies). Bacteriuria prevalence varied greatly (range 9.1-100%). Monitoring bacteriuria over time may help detect a reduction in bacteriuria, as demonstrated in three studies (follow-up range 5-18 months; sample size 18-56). The link between preceding bacteriuria and subsequent UTIs has not been fully explored yet. Short-term antimicrobial therapy may be useful in the immediate post-operative setting; however, long-term prophylactic treatment is ineffective in preventing bacteriuria. We recommend consistent reporting of bacteriuria definitions, the benefits of monitoring bacteriuria over time, and use of short-term antimicrobial therapy; bacteriuria should not be treated with long-term therapy.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectBacterial colonisationen
dc.subjectBacteriuriaen
dc.subjectSurveillanceen
dc.subjectUrinary diversionen
dc.titleSystematic review: bacterial colonisation of conduits and neobladders-when to test, watch, and treat.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleWorld Journal of Urologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationEJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationUrologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Urology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSurgery (University of Melbourne)en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00345-019-02964-8en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5710-1983en
dc.identifier.pubmedid31560122
local.name.researcherQu, Liang G
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

24
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.