Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25806
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaid, Catherine M-
dc.contributor.authorMcGinley, Jennifer L-
dc.contributor.authorSzoeke, Cassandra-
dc.contributor.authorWorkman, Barbara-
dc.contributor.authorHill, Keith D-
dc.contributor.authorWittwer, Joanne E-
dc.contributor.authorWoodward, Michael M-
dc.contributor.authorLiew, Danny-
dc.contributor.authorChurilov, Leonid-
dc.contributor.authorBernhardt, Julie-
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Meg E-
dc.date2021-01-31-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-07T23:58:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-07T23:58:08Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-31-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Geriatrics 202; 21(1): 90en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25806-
dc.description.abstractOlder people are often admitted for rehabilitation to improve walking, yet not everyone improves. The aim of this study was to determine key factors associated with a positive response to hospital-based rehabilitation in older people. This was a secondary data analysis from a multisite randomized controlled trial. Older people (n= 198, median age 80.9 years, IQR 76.6- 87.2) who were admitted to geriatric rehabilitation wards with a goal to improve walking were recruited. Participants were randomized to receive additional daily physical therapy focused on mobility (n = 99), or additional social activities (n = 99). Self-selected gait speed was measured on admission and discharge. Four participants withdrew. People who changed gait speed ≥0.1 m/s were classified as 'responders' (n = 130); those that changed <0.1m/s were classified as 'non-responders' (n = 64). Multivariable logistic regression explored the association of six pre-selected participant factors (age, baseline ambulation status, frailty, co-morbidities, cognition, depression) and two therapy factors (daily supervised upright activity time, rehabilitation days) and response. Responding to rehabilitation was associated with the number of days in rehabilitation (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.08; p = .039) and higher Mini Mental State Examination scores (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.14; p = .048). No other factors were found to have association with responding to rehabilitation. In older people with complex health problems or multi-morbidities, better cognition and a longer stay in rehabilitation were associated with a positive improvement in walking speed. Further research to explore who best responds to hospital-based rehabilitation and what interventions improve rehabilitation outcomes is warranted. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000884707; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01910740 .en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen
dc.subjectExercise therapyen
dc.subjectHospitalizationen
dc.subjectMobility limitationen
dc.subjectRehabilitationen
dc.titleFactors associated with improved walking in older people during hospital rehabilitation: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMC Geriatricsen
dc.identifier.affiliationMelbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationPhysiotherapyen
dc.identifier.affiliationHealthy Ageing Program, Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Centre for Medical Research, Parkville, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRehabilitation and Aged Care Services, Monash Health, Cheltenham, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMonash Ageing Research Centre (MONARC), Monash University, Cheltenham, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Peninsula Campus, McMahons Road, Frankston, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationLa Trobe Centre for Exercise and Sports Medicine Research, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAged Careen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine (Austin Health) and Melbourne Brain Centre at Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationStroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCRE Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Heidelberg, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationLa Trobe Centre for Exercise and Sports Medicine Research, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationVictorian Rehabilitation Centre, Healthscope Australia, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12877-021-02016-0en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid33517882
local.name.researcherChurilov, Leonid
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
crisitem.author.deptAged Care-
crisitem.author.deptGeriatric Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptMedicine (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

70
checked on Nov 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.