Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25056
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGao, Lan-
dc.contributor.authorMoodie, Marj-
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Peter J-
dc.contributor.authorChurilov, Leonid-
dc.contributor.authorKleinig, Timothy J-
dc.contributor.authorYassi, Nawaf-
dc.contributor.authorYan, Bernard-
dc.contributor.authorParsons, Mark W-
dc.contributor.authorDonnan, Geoffrey A-
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Stephen M-
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Bruce C V-
dc.date2020-10-07-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-15T03:16:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-15T03:16:44Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-
dc.identifier.citationStroke 2020; 51(12): 3681-3689en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25056-
dc.description.abstractTenecteplase improved functional outcomes and reduced the requirement for endovascular thrombectomy in ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion in the EXTEND-IA TNK randomized trial. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of tenecteplase versus alteplase in this trial. Post hoc within-trial economic analysis included costs of index emergency department and inpatient stroke hospitalization, rehabilitation/subacute care, and rehospitalization due to stroke within 90 days. Sources for cost included key study site complemented by published literature and government websites. Quality-adjusted life-years were estimated using utility scores derived from the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. Long-term modeled cost-effectiveness analysis used a Markov model with 7 health states corresponding to 7 modified Rankin Scale scores. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Within the 202 patients in the randomized controlled trial, total cost was nonsignificantly lower in the tenecteplase-treated patients (40 997 Australian dollars [AUD]) compared with alteplase-treated patients (46 188 AUD) for the first 90 days(P=0.125). Tenecteplase was the dominant treatment strategy in the short term, with similar cost (5412 AUD [95% CI, -13 348 to 2523]; P=0.181) and higher benefits (0.099 quality-adjusted life-years [95% CI, 0.001-0.1967]; P=0.048), with a 97.4% probability of being cost-effective. In the long-term, tenecteplase was associated with less additional lifetime cost (96 357 versus 106 304 AUD) and greater benefits (quality-adjusted life-years, 7.77 versus 6.48), and had a 100% probability of being cost-effective. Both deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Both within-trial and long-term economic analyses showed that tenecteplase was highly likely to be cost-effective for patients with acute stroke before thrombectomy. Recommending the use of tenecteplase over alteplase could lead to a cost saving to the healthcare system both in the short and long term. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02388061.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectcost-benefit analysisen
dc.subjectinfarctionen
dc.subjectStrokeen
dc.subjecttenecteplaseen
dc.subjectthrombectomyen
dc.titleCost-Effectiveness of Tenecteplase Before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleStrokeen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDeakin Health Economics, Institute of Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationPopulation Health and Immunity Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMedicine (University of Melbourne)en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Neurology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029666en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid33023423-
local.name.researcherChurilov, Leonid
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptMedicine (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health-
crisitem.author.deptThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

58
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.