Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25046
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZorron Cheng Tao Pu, Leonardo-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Gurpreet-
dc.contributor.authorRajadurai, Anton-
dc.contributor.authorTerbah, Ryma-
dc.contributor.authorDe Silva, Rahil-
dc.contributor.authorVaughan, Rhys B-
dc.contributor.authorEfthymiou, Marios-
dc.contributor.authorChandran, Sujievvan-
dc.date2020-10-10-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-15T03:15:16Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-15T03:15:16Z-
dc.date.issued2021-04-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2021; 36(4): 1064-1080en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25046-
dc.description.abstractDuring COVID-19 outbreak, restrictions to in-person consultations were introduced with a rise in telehealth. An indirect benefit of telehealth could be better attendance. This study aimed to assess "failure-to-attend" (FTA) rate and satisfaction for two endoscopy-related compulsory telehealth clinics during the COVID-19 outbreak. Consecutive patients booked for endoscopy-related telehealth clinics at a tertiary hospital were prospectively assessed. In-person clinic control data was assessed retrospectively. Sample size was calculated to detect an anticipated increase in attendance of 8%. Secondary outcomes included FTA differences between clinics and evaluation of patients and doctors satisfaction. Satisfaction was assessed based on 6 Likert scale questions used in previous telehealth research and asked to both patients and doctors (6Q_score). This study was exempt from IRB review after institutional IRB review. 691 patients were booked for appointments in our endoscopy clinics during the study periods (373 in 2020). FTA rates were lowered by half during the compulsory telehealth clinics (12.6% to 6.4%, p<0.01). The patient 6Q_score was higher for the Advanced Endoscopy clinic (84.6% versus 73.8%, p<0.01), while the doctor 6Q_score was similar between both Advanced and Post Endoscopy clinics (91.1% versus 92.5% respectively, p=0.80). An in-person follow-up consultation was suggested for 3.5% of the appointments, while the necessity of physical examination was flagged in 5.1%. The use of phone consultations in endoscopy-related clinics during the COVID-19 outbreak has improved FTA rates while demonstrating high satisfaction rates. The need for in-person follow-up consultations and physical examination were low.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectendoscopyen
dc.subjectoutpatient clinicen
dc.subjecttelehealthen
dc.titleBenefits of phone consultation for endoscopy-related clinics in the COVID-19 pandemic.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationGastroenterology and Hepatologyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jgh.15292en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7921-5631en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3654-2437en
dc.identifier.pubmedid33037824-
local.name.researcherChandran, Sujievvan
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptGastroenterology and Hepatology-
crisitem.author.deptGastroenterology and Hepatology-
crisitem.author.deptGastroenterology and Hepatology-
crisitem.author.deptGastroenterology and Hepatology-
crisitem.author.deptGastroenterology and Hepatology-
crisitem.author.deptGastroenterology and Hepatology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

148
checked on Oct 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.