Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/24946
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMacleod, Ashley-
dc.contributor.authorNair, Divya-
dc.contributor.authorIlbahar, Ekin-
dc.contributor.authorSellars, Marcus-
dc.contributor.authorNolte, Linda-
dc.date2020-09-21-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-02T03:26:56Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-02T03:26:56Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-21-
dc.identifier.citationHealth & Justice 2020; 8(1): 22en
dc.identifier.issn2194-7899-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/24946-
dc.description.abstractLimited information is available describing advance care planning (ACP) within correctional facilities, despite its increasing relevance due to the ageing population in prisons and the high rates of complex medical comorbidities. In Western countries, self-determination with respect to making future medical decisions is a human right that prisoners do not lose when they are remanded into custody. ACP enables individuals to plan for their health and personal care so their values, beliefs and preferences are made known to inform future decision-making, for a time when they can no longer communicate their decisions. This paper examines the limited academic literature relating to ACP within prisons to identify barriers and facilitators that influence the uptake of ACP and advance care directive (ACD) documentation. Common themes related to ACP in a correctional setting were extracted and synthesised to produce a high-level analysis of barriers and facilitators influencing ACP uptake for prisoners within a correctional setting. Six articles met the selection criteria and reported on the experience of ACP and ACDs in prisons; five from the United States of America and one from Switzerland. Three dominant themes were identified, with related subthemes: system-level factors, attitudes and perceptions, and ACP knowledge and comprehension. Barriers to ACP and ACD implementation were more prominent in articles than facilitators. Limited academic literature regarding the implementation and experience of ACP in prisons is available. The dominance of barriers identified in studies highlights key challenges for improving ACP uptake in correctional settings. Further research is required to understand the barriers, enablers, and attitudes to ACP in prisons.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAdvance care planningen
dc.subjectAdvance directivesen
dc.subjectCorrectionsen
dc.subjectEnd-of-life careen
dc.subjectPrisonersen
dc.titleIdentifying barriers and facilitators to implementing advance care planning in prisons: a rapid literature review.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleHealth & Justiceen
dc.identifier.affiliationAdvance Care Planningen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40352-020-00123-5en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9869-6824en
dc.identifier.pubmedid32959163-
local.name.researcherMacleod, Ashley
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptAdvance Care Planning-
crisitem.author.deptAdvance Care Planning-
crisitem.author.deptAdvance Care Planning-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

64
checked on Nov 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.