Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/24831
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLow, Stephanie-
dc.contributor.authorWee, Edmund-
dc.contributor.authorDorevitch, Michael I-
dc.date2020-09-09-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-28T23:22:11Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-28T23:22:11Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-26-
dc.identifier.citationAge and Ageing 2021; 50(2): 423-430en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/24831-
dc.description.abstractFollowing hip fracture surgery, patients from residential care are frequently excluded from inpatient rehabilitation. We aimed to assess the impact of place of residence and other factors such as frailty on rehabilitation outcomes after hip fracture surgery. Retrospective cohort study. Outcome measures included Functional Independence Measure efficiency, discharge destination and recovery of pre-fracture mobility. Univariable and multivariable linear or logistic regression analyses were performed. One general rehabilitation and two geriatric evaluation and management wards in a large public tertiary teaching hospital. A total of 844 patients who underwent inpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture surgery from 2010 to 2018. There were 139 (16%) patients from residential care. Being from residential care was not an independent predictor of poor outcomes. Premorbid frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale) was the strongest independent predictor of poorer Functional Independence Measure efficiency, inability to recover pre-fracture mobility and return to community dwelling. Dementia and delirium were also independently predictive of poor outcomes across all measures. Age > 90 years was independently predictive of inability to recover pre-fracture mobility and return to community dwelling. Being from residential care is not independently associated with poor outcomes following inpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture surgery and should not be the basis for excluding these patients from rehabilitation. Major predictors of poorer outcomes include premorbid frailty, dementia, delirium and age > 90 years. If able and motivated, those with potentially reversible functional limitations should be given the opportunity to participate in inpatient rehabilitation as even small gains can have a significant impact on quality of life.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectclinical frailty scaleen
dc.subjectfrailtyen
dc.subjecthip fractureen
dc.subjectolder peopleen
dc.subjectrehabilitationen
dc.subjectresidential careen
dc.titleImpact of place of residence, frailty and other factors on rehabilitation outcomes post hip fracture.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAge and Ageingen
dc.identifier.affiliationGeriatric Medicineen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ageing/afaa131en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid32902621-
local.name.researcherDorevitch, Michael I
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptGeriatric Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptGeriatric Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

52
checked on Nov 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.