Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/24527
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPerera, Marlon-
dc.contributor.authorMirchandani, Rohan-
dc.contributor.authorPapa, Nathan-
dc.contributor.authorBreemer, Geoff-
dc.contributor.authorEffeindzourou, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Lewis-
dc.contributor.authorSwindle, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Elliot-
dc.date2020-08-03-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-28T20:42:04Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-28T20:42:04Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-
dc.identifier.citationWorld Journal of Urology 2021; 39(6): 1897-1902en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/24527-
dc.description.abstractThe majority of prostate cancer diagnoses are facilitated by testing serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels. Despite this, there are limitations to the diagnostic accuracy of PSA. Consideration of patient demographic factors and biochemical adjuncts to PSA may improve prostate cancer risk stratification. We aimed to develop a contemporary, accurate and cost-effective model based on objective measures to improve the accuracy of prostate cancer risk stratification. Data were collated from a local institution and combined with patient data retrieved from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer screening Trial (PLCO) database. Using a dataset of 4548 patients, a machine learning model was developed and trained using PSA, free-PSA, age and free-PSA to total PSA (FTR) ratio. The model was trained on a dataset involving 3638 patients and was then tested on a separate set of 910 patients. The model improved prediction for prostate cancer (AUC 0.72) compared to PSA alone (AUC 0.63), age (AUC 0.52), free-PSA (AUC 0.50) and FTR alone (AUC 0.65). When an operating point is chosen such that the sensitivity of the model is 80% the specificity of the model is 45.3%. The benefit in AUC secondary to the model was related to sample size, with AUC of 0.64 observed when a subset of the cohort was assessed. Development of a dense neural network model improved the diagnostic accuracy in screening for prostate cancer. These results demonstrate an additional utility of machine learning methods in prostate cancer risk stratification when using biochemical parameters.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen
dc.subjectMachine learningen
dc.subjectProstate canceren
dc.subjectProstate cancer screeningen
dc.subjectProstate-specific membrane antigenen
dc.titlePSA-based machine learning model improves prostate cancer risk stratification in a screening population.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleWorld Journal of Urologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSurgery (University of Melbourne)en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Urology, Mater Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMaxwell Plus, Brisbane, QLD, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00345-020-03392-9en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid32747980-
local.name.researcherPerera, Marlon
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

26
checked on Nov 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.