Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/23886
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLe, Cai-
dc.contributor.authorMa, Ke-
dc.contributor.authorTang, Pingfen-
dc.contributor.authorEdvardsson, David-
dc.contributor.authorBehm, Lina-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jie-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Jiqun-
dc.contributor.authorFu, Haiyan-
dc.contributor.authorAhlström, Gerd-
dc.date2020-07-13-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-27T05:09:36Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-27T05:09:36Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-13-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ open 2020; 10(7): e031580-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/23886-
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to test a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties. P-CAT was translated/back-translated using established procedures before the psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version was made. Two hospitals covering urban and suburban areas of Kunming in the Yunnan province of China. 152 female hospital staff completed the survey. Construct validity and reliability, including internal consistency and test-retest reliability, were assessed among a sample of hospital staff. The factor analysis resulted in a two-component solution that consisted of two subscales. The corrected item-total correlations for all of the items ranged from 0.14 to 0.44, with six items not meeting the cut-off level for item-total correlation (>0.3). The Chinese P-CAT demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.91-0.94 for the scales and a test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.88 for the overall scale scores. The intraclass correlation was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.95). P-CAT appears to be a promising measure for evaluating staff perceptions of person-centredness in Chinese hospital environments. The results show that P-CAT can be a useful tool for improving the quality of healthcare in terms of person-centred care in the Chinese context.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectfactor analysis-
dc.subjectinstrument evaluation-
dc.subjectolder people-
dc.subjectpalliative care-
dc.subjectperson-centred care-
dc.titlePsychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMJ open-
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Public Health, Kunming Medical University in Kunming, Kunming, China-
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe Universityen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health Clinical School of Nursing, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationPalliative Care, The Third People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, Yunnan, China-
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Nursing, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China-
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University College, Kristianstad, Sweden-
dc.identifier.affiliationPalliative Care, The Third People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, Yunnan, China-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Palliative Care, The Third People's Hospital of Kunming, Kunming, China-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031580-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7315-8077-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6230-7583en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8787-2327en
dc.identifier.pubmedid32665340-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.