Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrown, James-
dc.contributor.authorReid, Helen-
dc.contributor.authorDornan, Tim-
dc.contributor.authorNestel, Debra-
dc.identifier.citationMedical education 2020; online first: 29 Aprilen
dc.description.abstractBecoming a clinician is a trajectory of identity formation in the context of supervised practice. This is a social process where the supervisory relationship is key. Therefore, to know how to support identity formation of clinical trainees, it is necessary to understand how this happens within the supervisory relationship. Our aim was to develop a conceptualisation of trainee identity formation within the general practice(GP) supervisory relationship to aid its support. We took a critical realist approach using case study design and 'cultural worlds' theory as a conceptual frame. Each case comprised a GP trainee/supervisor pair. Our data were weekly audio-recordings of interactions between trainee, supervisor and a patient over 12-weeks augmented by post-interaction reflections and sequential interviews. We undertook interpretive analysis using dialogic methods focusing on the doing of language and the cultural Discourses expressed. We identified three social Discourses centring on: clinical responsibility; ownership of clinical knowledge; and, measures of trainee competency. Versions of these Discourses defined four trainee/supervisor relational arrangements within which trainee and supervisor assumed reciprocal identities. We labelled these: junior learner/expert clinician; apprentice assistant/master coach; co-clinicians; and, lead clinician/advisor. We found a trajectory across these identity arrangements. Behind this trajectory was an invitation by the supervisor to the trainee into the social space of clinician and a readiness of the trainee to accept this invitation. Congruence in supervisor and trainee positioning was important. In the supervisory relationship, trainee and supervisor adopted reciprocal identities. For trainees to progress to identity of lead clinician, supervisors needed to invite their trainee into this space and vacate it themselves. Congruence between supervisor positioning of their trainee and trainee authorship of themselves was important and was aided by explicit dialogue and common purpose. We offer a model and language for trainees, supervisors and faculty to facilitate this.en
dc.titleBecoming a clinician: Trainee identity formation within the GP supervisory relationship.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleMedical educationen
dc.identifier.affiliationEV GP Training, Suite B2, 50 Northways Road, Churchill, VIC, AUS, 3842, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationQueen's University Belfast, Centre for Medical Education, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK, BT9 7BLen
dc.identifier.affiliationMonash University, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, VIC, AUS, 3168, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMaastricht University, Department of Educational Development and Research, PO Box 616, Maastricht, NL, 6200 MD, Netherlandsen
dc.identifier.affiliationQueen's University Belfast, Centre for Medical Education, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK, BT9 7BLen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

checked on Jan 19, 2021

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.