Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/22837
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGulhati, Pat-
dc.contributor.authorYin, Jun-
dc.contributor.authorPederson, Levi-
dc.contributor.authorSchmoll, Hans-Joachim-
dc.contributor.authorHoff, Paulo-
dc.contributor.authorDouillard, Jean-Yves-
dc.contributor.authorHecht, J Randolph-
dc.contributor.authorTournigand, Christophe-
dc.contributor.authorTebbutt, Niall C-
dc.contributor.authorChibaudel, Benoist-
dc.contributor.authorDe Gramont, Aimery-
dc.contributor.authorShi, Qian-
dc.contributor.authorOverman, Michael James-
dc.date2020-03-19-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-23T22:10:38Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-23T22:10:38Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-19-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the National Cancer Institute 2020; online first: 19 March-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/22837-
dc.description.abstractCarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are used in conjunction with imaging to monitor response to systemic therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We sought to identify a threshold for CEA change from baseline to predict progressive disease (PD) in mCRC patients receiving first-line therapy. Patients from trials collected in the ARCAD database were included if baseline CEA was ≥10ng/mL and repeat CEA was available within 14 days of first restaging scan. Optimal cutoffs for CEA change were identified by ROC analysis. Prediction performance of cutoffs was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV). Analyses were conducted by treatment class: chemotherapy alone (chemo), chemotherapy with anti-VEGF antibody (anti-VEGF), and chemotherapy with anti-EGFR antibody (anti-EGFR). 2643 mCRC patients treated with systemic therapy were included. Median percent change of CEA from baseline to first restaging for patients with CR/PR/SD (non-PD) and PD was -53.1% and +23.6% for chemo (n=957), and -71.7% and -45.3% for anti-VEGF (n=1355). The optimal AUC cutoff for differentiating PD from non-PD on first restaging was -7.5% for chemo and -62.0% for anti-VEGF, chemo, ORadj=6.51 (95%CI 3.31-12.83, P < 0.001); anti-VEGF, ORadj=3.45 (95%CI 1.93-6.18, P < 0.001). A 99% NPV clinical cutoff for prediction of non-PD would avoid CT scan at first restaging in 21.0% of chemo and 16.2% of anti-VEGF treated patients. Among patients with SD on first restaging, those with CEA decrease from baseline had statistically significantly improved progression-free and overall survival. Change in CEA from baseline to first restaging can accurately predict non-progression and correlates with long-term outcomes in patients receiving systemic chemotherapy.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectARCAD-
dc.subjectCEA-
dc.subjectColorectal cancer-
dc.subjectcolon cancer-
dc.titleThreshold Change in CEA as a Predictor of Non-Progression to First-Line Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients with Elevated CEA.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of the National Cancer Institute-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationDavid Gergen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationIntegrated Centres for Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, St-Herblain, Franceen
dc.identifier.affiliationHospital Henri Mondor, Paris, Franceen
dc.identifier.affiliationFranco-British Institute, Levallois-Peret, Franceen
dc.identifier.affiliationHospital Saint-Antoine, Paris, Franceen
dc.identifier.affiliationKlinik fur Innere Med IV, University Clinic Halle, Halle, Germany-
dc.identifier.affiliationCentro de Oncologia de Brasilia do Sirio Libanes-Unidade Lago Sul, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jnci/djaa020-
dc.identifier.pubmedid32191317-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherTebbutt, Niall C
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptMedical Oncology-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Oct 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.