Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/22241
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAl-Kaisey, Ahmed M-
dc.contributor.authorKoshy, Anoop N-
dc.contributor.authorHa, Francis J-
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Ryan-
dc.contributor.authorToner, Liam-
dc.contributor.authorSajeev, Jithin K-
dc.contributor.authorTeh, Andrew W-
dc.contributor.authorFarouque, Omar-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Han S-
dc.date2019-11-18-
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-12T23:08:25Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-12T23:08:25Z-
dc.date.issued2020-02-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Cardiology 2020; 300: 161-164en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/22241-
dc.description.abstractWrist-worn heart rate (HR) monitors are increasingly popular. A paucity of data exists on their accuracy in atrial fibrillation (AF) in ambulatory patients. We sought to assess the HR accuracy of two commercially available smart watches [SW] (Fitbit Charge HR [FB] and Apple Watch Series 3 [AW]) compared with Holter monitoring in an ambulant patient cohort. Thirty-two participants ≥18 years referred for 24-hour Holter monitoring were prospectively recruited. Each participant was randomly allocated to wear either a FB or AW along with their Holter monitor. Across all devices, 53,288 heart rate values were analysed from 32 participants. Twenty wore the AW (17 had persistent AF and 3 had sinus rhythm [SR]) while 12 participants wore the FB (9 in persistent AF and 3 in SR). Participants in SR demonstrated strong agreement compared to Holter monitoring (bias <1 beat, limits of agreement [LoA] -11 to 11 beats). In AF, both devices underestimated HR measurements (bias -9 beats, LoA -41 to 23). The degree of underestimation was more pronounced when HR > 100 bpm (bias of -28 beats for HR range 100-120 bpm, -48 for 120-140 bpm, and -69 for >140 bpm) compared to a slower HR (bias of -6 for HR range 80-100 bpm, <1 for 60-80 bpm, and -1 for <60 bpm). In ambulatory patients, smartwatches underestimated HR in AF particularly at HR ranges >100 bpm. Further improvements in device technology are needed before integrating them into the clinical management of rate control in AF.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAccuracyen_US
dc.subjectArrhythmiaen_US
dc.subjectAtrial fibrillationen_US
dc.subjectHeart rateen_US
dc.subjectSmart watchen_US
dc.titleAccuracy of wrist-worn heart rate monitors for rate control assessment in atrial fibrillation.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternational Journal of Cardiologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiology, Eastern Health, Boxhill, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCardiologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.11.120en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8741-8631en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3206-5725en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5174-1034en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7288-3362en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid31787389-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherFarouque, Omar
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on Dec 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.