Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWatson, David I-
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Sarah K-
dc.contributor.authorDevitt, Peter G-
dc.contributor.authorAly, Ahmad-
dc.contributor.authorIrvine, Tanya-
dc.contributor.authorWoods, Simon D-
dc.contributor.authorGan, Susan-
dc.contributor.authorGame, Philip A-
dc.contributor.authorJamieson, Glyn G-
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Surgery 2020; 272(2): 241-247en
dc.descriptionDuplicated in PubMed: PMID for Pre-print is 31804398en
dc.description.abstractTo determine whether absorbable or nonabsorbable mesh repair of large hiatus hernias is followed by less recurrences at late follow-up compared to sutured repair. Radiological recurrences have been reported in up to 30% of patients after repair of large hiatus hernias, and mesh repair has been proposed as a solution. Earlier trials have revealed mixed outcomes and early outcomes from a trial reported previously revealed no short-term advantages for mesh repair. Multicentre prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of 3 methods of hiatus hernia repair; sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh. Primary outcome - hernia recurrence assessed by barium meal X-ray and endoscopy at 3-4 years. Secondary outcomes - clinical symptom scores at 2, 3, and 5 years. 126 patients were enrolled - 43 sutures, 41 absorbable mesh, and 42 nonabsorbable mesh. Clinical outcomes were obtained at 5 years in 89.9%, and objective follow-up was obtained in 72.3%. A recurrent hernia (any size) was identified in 39.3% after suture repair, 56.7% - absorbable mesh, and 42.9% - nonabsorbable mesh (P = 0.371). Clinical outcomes were similar at 5 years, except chest pain, diarrhea, and bloat symptoms which were more common after repair with absorbable mesh. No advantages were demonstrated for mesh repair at up to 5 years follow-up, and symptom outcomes were worse after repair with absorbable mesh. The longer-term results from this trial do not support mesh repair for large hiatus hernias.en
dc.titleFive Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia With Sutures Versus Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Mesh.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnnals of Surgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationFlinders University Discipline of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCabrini Hospital, Malvern, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDiscipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australiaen
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

checked on Jun 7, 2023

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.