Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/21930
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaxendale, Sallie A-
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Sarah J-
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Gus A-
dc.contributor.authorBarr, William-
dc.contributor.authorHelmstaedter, Christoph-
dc.contributor.authorHermann, Bruce P-
dc.contributor.authorLangfitt, John-
dc.contributor.authorReuner, Gitta-
dc.contributor.authorRzezak, Patricia-
dc.contributor.authorSamson, Séverine-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Mary-Lou-
dc.date2019-10-14-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-20T22:40:33Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-20T22:40:33Z-
dc.date.issued2019-10-14-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of neurology 2019; online first: 14 October-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/21930-
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes ten core features of a neuropsychological assessment with the aim of helping neurologists understand the unique contribution the evaluation can make within the wider context of diagnostic methods in epilepsy. The possibilities, limitations and cautions associated with the investigation are discussed under the headings below: 1. A neuropsychological assessment is a collaborative investigation. 2. Assessment prior to treatment allows for the accurate assessment of treatment effects. 3. The nature of an underlying lesion and its neurodevelopmental context play an important role in shaping the associated neuropsychological deficit. 4. Cognitive and behavioural impairments result from the essential comorbidities of epilepsy which can be considered as much a disorder of cognition and behaviour as of seizures. 5. Patient's subjective complaints can help us understand objective cognitive impairments and their underlying neuroanatomy, resulting in improved patient care. At other times, patient complaints reflect other factors and require careful interpretation. 6. The results from a neuropsychological assessment can be used to maximise the educational and occupational potentials of people with epilepsy. 7. Not all patients are able to engage with a neuropsychological assessment. 8. There are limitations in assessments conducted in a second language with tests that have been standardized on different populations to that of the patient. 9. Adequate intervals between assessments maximise sensitivity to meaningful change. 10. Patients should be fully informed about the purpose of the assessment and have realistic expectations of the outcome prior to referral.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectEpilepsy-
dc.subjectassessment-
dc.subjectcognition-
dc.subjectmemory-
dc.titleTen things every neurologist needs to know about neuropsychological assessments and interventions in people with epilepsy.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleEuropean journal of neurology-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Institute of Neurology, UCL, London-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartments of Neurology & Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, New York, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartments of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Neurology, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USAen
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity Department of Neurosciences, Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany-
dc.identifier.affiliationCenter for Child and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital, Heidelberg and Institute for Educational Studies, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Germany, Medical Department, University of Heidelberg, Germany-
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute and Department of Psychiatry, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil-
dc.identifier.affiliationEpilepsy Unit, la Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France and Neuropsychology and Auditory Cognition, University of Lille, France-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga and Neurosciences and Mental Health Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada-
dc.identifier.affiliationComprehensive Epilepsy Program, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ene.14104-
dc.identifier.pubmedid31610070-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
dc.type.austinReview-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

6
checked on Feb 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.