Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAli, Stephen-
dc.contributor.authorAhn, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorPapa, Nathan-
dc.contributor.authorPerera, Marlon-
dc.contributor.authorTeloken, Patrick-
dc.contributor.authorCoughlin, Geoffrey-
dc.contributor.authorWood, Simon T-
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Matthew J-
dc.identifier.citationANZ Journal of Surgery 2020; 90(1-2): 48-52-
dc.description.abstractGuidelines recommend nephron sparing surgery where possible for patients with T1 renal tumours. The trends of nephron sparing surgery outside the USA are limited, particularly since the introduction of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). The aim of this study was to describe contemporary surgical management patterns of renal tumours in Australia according to Medicare claims data. Claims data according to the Medicare Benefits Schedule on surgical management of renal tumours in adult Australians between January 2000 and December 2016 was collated. Analysis of absolute number, population-adjusted rate and renal cancer-adjusted rate of interventions according to age and gender were performed, as well as proportion of RAPN. Between 2000 and 2016, the rate of partial nephrectomy (PN) increased while radical nephrectomy (RN) remained stable (PN: 0.87-4.16, RN: 6.52-6.70 per 100 000 population). Since 2015, PN has become more common than RN in patients aged 25 to 44 years (0.98 versus 0.95 procedures per 100 000 population). Renal cancer-adjusted rate exhibited a trend towards increasing utilization of PN and reduced RN across all age groups. An increase in overall surgical treatment was observed (25%-41%), mainly due to increased treatment of patients older than 75 years. The proportion of RAPN was seen to rapidly increase (4.7% in 2010 to 58% in 2016). Treatment utilization for renal masses has markedly changed in Australia according to Medicare claims. PN is increasingly replacing RN in younger patients, and older patients are receiving more surgical treatment. The impact of increased RAPN utilization is yet to be determined.-
dc.subjectlaparoscopic nephrectomy-
dc.subjectpartial nephrectomy-
dc.subjectradical nephrectomy-
dc.subjectrenal cell carcinoma-
dc.titleChanging trends in surgical management of renal tumours from 2000 to 2016: a nationwide study of Medicare claims data.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleANZ Journal of Surgery-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Kidney Disease Research, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationNepean Urology Research Group, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australiaen
dc.type.austinJournal Article-, Marlon
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

checked on May 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.