Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/21665
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHanna, Bishoy-
dc.contributor.authorRanasinghe, Weranja-
dc.contributor.authorLawrentschuk, Nathan-
dc.date2019-08-28-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-02T01:06:48Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-02T01:06:48Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationCurrent opinion in urology 2019; 29(6): 612-619-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/21665-
dc.description.abstractSignificant morbidity is associated with overtreatment of clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). Risk stratification tools such as novel biomarkers, MRI and risk calculators are useful in predicting which patients would benefit from active surveillance. This review examines current risk stratification tools in localized PCa and the safety of active surveillance in these patients. Very low risk, low-risk and favourable intermediate-risk PCa variants may benefit from treatment with active surveillance. These disease categories have been shown (with up to 10-year follow-up) to have survival and cancer-specific complication rates similar to immediate definitive treatment. Novel biomarkers sensitively predict upstaging, recurrence and metastatic progression while multiparametric MRI reliably detects clinically significant PCa and is valuable in the biopsy naïve patient considering active surveillance. Lastly, risk calculators and nomograms are being developed to combine clinical data and provide optimal individualized treatment while minimizing overtreatment in clinically localized disease. Although large randomized trials are needed to validate treatment pathways, current data supports active surveillance in certain clinically localized PCa. Many tools exist to define and support active surveillance in this group.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titleRisk stratification and avoiding overtreatment in localized prostate cancer.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleCurrent opinion in urology-
dc.identifier.affiliationNorthern Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales-
dc.identifier.affiliationEJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationOrange Base Hospital, Orange, New South Wales-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centreen
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MOU.0000000000000672-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8553-5618-
dc.identifier.pubmedid31469662-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

18
checked on Dec 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.