Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/21479
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorConsidine, Julie-
dc.contributor.authorRhodes, Kerryn-
dc.contributor.authorJones, Daryl A-
dc.contributor.authorCurrey, Judy-
dc.date2018-03-21-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T05:00:36Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-12T05:00:36Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-
dc.identifier.citationAustralasian emergency care 2018; 21(1): 3-7-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/21479-
dc.description.abstractThe study aim was to explore the systems for recognising and responding to clinical deterioration in adult and paediatric Victorian emergency department (ED) patients after their initial triage assessment. A survey of Victorian EDs was conducted. Senior ED nursing staff was asked about ED characteristics, vital sign documentation, systems for recognising and responding to deteriorating ED patients, quality assurance and governance of ED rapid response systems (RRSs). Sixteen EDs participated (17 metropolitan and 13 regional or rural) giving a response rate of 53.3% (16/30). The organisational definition of a deteriorating patient applied to the ED at 50% of sites (n=8). Vital sign documentation was paper-based (43.6%), electronic (37.6%) or a combination (18.8%) of both. The majority of EDs (87.5%, n=14) had an ED RRS; 50% had one tier, single trigger RRS and 31.3% of EDs had a two tier, single trigger RRS. At 68.8% of sites the ED RRS activation criteria were the same as ward MET (medical emergency team) activation criteria. The most common method of escalation of care for deteriorating ED patients were face-to-face communication (87.5%) and overhead announcements within the ED (68.8%). The ED rapid response team (RRT) was composed of ED specific staff in 50.5% of sites, and staff external to the ED at 12.5% of sites. Two thirds of sites (68.7%) collected data about clinical deterioration in ED patients. Most EDs had an RRS but there was variability in activation criteria and members of the responding team both between EDs, and between ED and the ward RRSs.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectClinical deterioration-
dc.subjectClinical risk management-
dc.subjectEmergency department-
dc.subjectEmergency nursing-
dc.subjectRapid response teams-
dc.titleSystems for recognition and response to clinical deterioration in Victorian emergency departments.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleAustralasian emergency care-
dc.identifier.affiliationDeakin University, Geelong, School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDeakin University, Geelong, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Eastern Health Partnership, Box Hill, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationWimmera Health Care Group, Horsham, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.auec.2017.12.003-
dc.identifier.pubmedid30998862-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.