Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/21130
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWight, Joel C-
dc.contributor.authorYue, Mimi-
dc.contributor.authorKeane, Colm-
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorLinton, Kim-
dc.contributor.authorChin, Collin-
dc.contributor.authorWai, Shin Hnin-
dc.contributor.authorTalaulikar, Dipti-
dc.contributor.authorGasiorowski, Robin-
dc.contributor.authorCheah, Chan Yoon-
dc.contributor.authorGregory, Gareth P-
dc.contributor.authorDickinson, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorMinson, Adrian-
dc.contributor.authorCoombes, Caitlin-
dc.contributor.authorKu, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Stephanie-
dc.contributor.authorHawkes, Eliza A-
dc.date2019-06-24-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-08T05:20:50Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-08T05:20:50Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationBritish journal of haematology 2019; 187(2): 174-184-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/21130-
dc.description.abstractDe novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) presenting with synchronous central nervous system (CNS) and systemic disease (synDLBCL) is not well described and is excluded from clinical trials. We performed a retrospective analysis of 80 synDLBCL patients treated across 10 Australian and UK centres. Of these patients, 96% had extranodal systemic disease. CNS-directed treatment with combination intravenous cytarabine and high-dose methotrexate ("CNS-intensive") (n = 38) was associated with favourable survival outcomes compared with "CNS-conservative" strategies such as intravenous high-dose methotrexate monotherapy, intrathecal therapy and/or radiotherapy (2-year progression-free survival [PFS] 50% vs. 31%, P = 0·006; 2-year overall survival [OS] 54% vs. 44%, P = 0·037). Outcomes were primarily dictated by the ability to control the CNS disease, with 2-year cumulative CNS relapse incidence of 42% and non-CNS relapse 21%. Two-year OS for CNS-relapse patients was 13% vs. 36% for non-CNS relapses (P = 0·02). Autologous stem cell transplantation as consolidation (n = 14) was not observed to improve survival in those patients who received CNS-intensive induction when matched for induction outcomes (2-year PFS 69% vs. 56%, P = 0·99; 2-year OS 66% vs. 56%, P = 0·98). Hyperfractionated or infusional systemic treatment did not improve survival compared to R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) (2-year OS 49% for both groups). Our study suggests that adequate control of the CNS disease is paramount and is best achieved by intensive CNS-directed induction.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectcentral nervous system lymphoma-
dc.subjectcytarabine-
dc.subjectde novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma-
dc.subjectsynchronous lymphoma-
dc.titleOutcomes of synchronous systemic and central nervous system (CNS) involvement of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma are dictated by the CNS disease: a collaborative study of the Australasian Lymphoma Alliance.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleBritish journal of haematology-
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UKen
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Western Australia Medical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester, UKen
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationConcord Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian National University Medical School, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMonash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationLa Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCanberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationClinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSir Charles Gardiner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bjh.16064-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3216-2392-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2819-4041-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6766-8345-
dc.identifier.pubmedid31236941-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherHawkes, Eliza A
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptClinical Haematology-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
crisitem.author.deptClinical Haematology-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on Jul 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.