Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20522
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZebaze, Roger M D-
dc.contributor.authorOsima, Marit-
dc.contributor.authorBui, Minh-
dc.contributor.authorLukic, Marko-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xiaofang-
dc.contributor.authorGhasem-Zadeh, Ali-
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Erik F-
dc.contributor.authorVais, Angela-
dc.contributor.authorShore-Lorenti, Catherine-
dc.contributor.authorEbeling, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorSeeman, Ego-
dc.contributor.authorBjørnerem, Åshild-
dc.date2019-03-18-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T01:07:34Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-02T01:07:34Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Bone and Mineral Research 2019; 34(8): 1451-1460en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20522-
dc.description.abstractAdvancing age is accompanied by a reduction in bone formation and remodeling imbalance, which produces microstructural deterioration. This may be partly due to diversion of mesenchymal cells towards adipocytes rather than osteoblast lineage cells. We hypothesized that microstructural deterioration will be associated with an increased marrow adiposity, and each of these traits will be independently associated with nonvertebral fractures and improve discrimination of women with fractures from controls over that achieved by femoral neck (FN) areal bone mineral density (aBMD) alone. The marrow adiposity and bone microstructure were quantified from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) images of the distal tibia and distal radius in 77 women aged 40-70 years with a recent nonvertebral fracture and 226 controls in Melbourne, Australia. Marrow fat measurement from HR-pQCT images was validated using direct histologic measurement as gold standard, at the distal radius of 15 sheep, with an agreement (R2 = 0.86, p < 0.0001). Each standard deviation (SD) higher distal tibia marrow adiposity was associated with 0.33 SD higher cortical porosity, 0.60 SD fewer, 0.24 SD thinner and 0.72 SD more separated trabeculae (all p < 0.05). Adjusted for age and FN aBMD, odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for fracture per SD higher marrow adiposity and cortical porosity were 3.39 (2.14-5.38) and 1.79 (1.14-2.80), respectively. Discrimination of women with fracture from controls improved when cortical porosity was added to FN aBMD and age (AUC 0.778 vs. 0.751, p = 0.006) or marrow adiposity was added to FN aBMD and age (AUC 0.825 vs. 0.751, p = 0.002). The model including FN aBMD, age, cortical porosity, trabecular thickness and marrow adiposity had an AUC = 0.888. Results were similar for the distal radius. Whether marrow adiposity and cortical porosity indices improve identification of women at risk for fractures requires validation in prospective studies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectHR-pQCTen_US
dc.subjectcortical porosityen_US
dc.subjectmarrow adiposityen_US
dc.subjectnonvertebral fractureen_US
dc.subjectwomenen_US
dc.titleAdding Marrow Adiposity and Cortical Porosity to Femoral Neck Areal Bone Mineral Density Improves the Discrimination of Women with Nonvertebral Fractures from Controls.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Bone and Mineral Researchen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norwayen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norwayen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norwayen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepatment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norwayen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationEndocrinologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationMary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationHudson Institute for Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norwayen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norwayen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationMedicine (University of Melbourne)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jbmr.3721en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7406-9658en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7114-7857en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3246-3205en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2921-3742en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9692-048Xen_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3123-2950en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid30883870-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherGhasem-Zadeh, Ali
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptEndocrinology-
crisitem.author.deptEndocrinology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

48
checked on Nov 4, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.