Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20314
Title: Renal perfusion, oxygenation, and sympathetic nerve activity during volatile or intravenous general anaesthesia in sheep.
Austin Authors: Iguchi, Naoya;Kosaka, Junko;Booth, Lindsea C;Iguchi, Yoko;Evans, Roger G;Bellomo, Rinaldo ;May, Clive N;Lankadeva, Yugeesh R
Affiliation: Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Department of Anaesthesiology, Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Osaka, Japan
Preclinical Critical Care Unit, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Cardiovascular Disease Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Physiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Department of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: Mar-2019
Date: 2019-01-11
Publication information: British journal of anaesthesia 2019; 122(3): 342-349
Abstract: Global and intra-renal perfusion and oxygenation may be affected by the choice of anaesthetic. We compared the effects of isoflurane with those of propofol and fentanyl on renal blood flow (RBF) and intra-renal perfusion and oxygenation, and assessed how these were associated with renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA). A renal artery flow probe and laser Doppler and oxygen-sensing probes were surgically implanted in the renal medulla and cortex in 20 Merino ewes. RSNA was measured in 12 additional ewes. We compared the effects of volatile or i.v. anaesthesia on global RBF, renal oxygen delivery (RDO2), intra-renal perfusion, and RSNA with the non-anaesthetised state on postoperative day 3 as control reference. Compared with a non-anaesthetised state, volatile anaesthesia reduced global RBF [-76 (82-68)%], RDO2 [-76 (83-71)%], and cortical [-68 (74-54)%] and medullary [-76 (84-72)%] perfusion. I.V. anaesthesia reduced RBF [-55 (67-38)%], RDO2 [-55 (65-44)%], and cortical [-27 (45-6)%] and medullary [-35 (48-30)%] perfusion, but to a lesser extent than volatile anaesthesia. Renal PO2 was not influenced by anaesthesia, whilst RSNA was elevated during volatile, but not during i.v. anaesthesia. Volatile and i.v. general anaesthesia markedly reduced global RBF, RDO2, and regional kidney perfusion. These effects were greater with volatile anaesthesia, and were paralleled by an increase in RSNA. Our findings suggest a neurogenic modulatory effect of anaesthetics on renal perfusion and oxygenation.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20314
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.018
ORCID: 0000-0002-1650-8939
Journal: British journal of anaesthesia
PubMed URL: 30770052
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: fentanyl
i.v. anaesthesia
isoflurane
propofol
renal blood flow
renal perfusion
renal sympathetic nerve activity
volatile anaesthesia
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on Dec 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.