Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20284
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMacCraith, Eoin-
dc.contributor.authorForde, James C-
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Niall F-
dc.date2019-02-22-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-04T22:04:13Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-04T22:04:13Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of robotic surgery 2019; 13(3): 371-377-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20284-
dc.description.abstractSimulation in surgery is a safe and cost-effective way of training. Operating room performance is improved after simulation training. The necessary attributes of surgical simulators are acceptability and cost-effectiveness. It is also necessary for a simulator to demonstrate face, content, predictive, construct and concurrent validity. Urologists have embraced robot-assisted surgery. These procedures require steep learning curves. There are 6 VR simulators available for robot-assisted surgery; the daVinci Skills Simulator (dVSS), the Mimic dV Trainer (MdVT), the ProMIS simulator, the Simsurgery Educational Platform (SEP) simulator, the Robotic Surgical Simulator (RoSS) and the RobotiX Mentor (RM). Their efficacy is limited by the lack of comparative studies, standardisation of validation and high cost. There are a number of robotic surgery training curricula developed in recent years which successfully include simulation training. There are growing calls for these simulators to be incorporated into the urology training curriculum globally to shorten the learning curve without compromising patient safety. Surgical educators in urology should aim to develop a cost-effective, acceptable, validated simulator that can be incorporated into a standardised, validated robot-assisted surgery training curriculum for the next generation of robotic surgeons.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectRobot-
dc.subjectRobotic-
dc.subjectSimulation-
dc.subjectSurgery-
dc.subjectTraining-
dc.subjectUrology-
dc.titleRobotic simulation training for urological trainees: a comprehensive review on cost, merits and challenges.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of robotic surgery-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Urology, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11701-019-00934-1-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5814-0722-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5298-1475-
dc.identifier.pubmedid30796671-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
dc.type.austinReview-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.