Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20222
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Kane, Dermot B-
dc.contributor.authorBaldwin, Graham S-
dc.contributor.authorBolton, Damien M-
dc.contributor.authorIschia, Joseph J-
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Oneel-
dc.date2019-01-11-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-04T23:34:07Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-04T23:34:07Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08-11-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Nephrology 2019; 132(4): 539-547en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20222-
dc.description.abstractAcute kidney injury (AKI) as a result of ischaemia-reperfusion represents a major healthcare burden worldwide. Mortality rates from AKI in hospitalized patients are extremely high and have changed little despite decades of research and medical advances. In 1986, Murry et al. demonstrated for the first time the phenomenon of ischaemic preconditioning to protect against ischaemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). This seminal finding paved the way for a broad body of research, which attempted to understand and ultimately harness this phenomenon for human application. The ability of preconditioning to limit renal IRI has now been demonstrated in multiple different animal models. However, more than 30 years later, a safe and consistent method of protecting human organs, including the kidneys, against IRI is still not available. This review highlights agents which, despite strong preclinical data, have recently failed to reduce AKI in human trials. The multiple reasons which may have contributed to the failure to translate some of the promising findings to clinical therapies are discussed. Agents which hold promise in the clinic because of their recent efficacy in preclinical large animal models are also reviewed.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAnimal modelsen
dc.subjectIschaemiaen
dc.subjectPreconditioningen
dc.subjectReperfusionen
dc.subjectTranslationen
dc.subjectZincen
dc.titlePreconditioning against renal ischaemia reperfusion injury: the failure to translate to the clinic.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Nephrologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40620-019-00582-6en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0944-8747en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5145-6783en
dc.identifier.pubmedid30635875-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
dc.type.austinReview-
local.name.researcherBolton, Damien M
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Jul 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.