Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19667
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCanet, Emmanuel-
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldo-
dc.date2018-10-10-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T22:28:40Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-23T22:28:40Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10-10-
dc.identifier.citationCurrent opinion in critical care 2018; 24(6): 568-574-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19667-
dc.description.abstractThe present article reviews the recent literature on the main aspects of perioperative acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI occurs in 1 in every 10 surgical patients, with cardiac, orthopedic, and major abdominal surgeries being the procedures associated with the highest risk. Overall, complex operations, bleeding, and hemodynamic instability are the most consistent procedure-related risk factors for AKI. AKI increases hospital stay, mortality, and chronic kidney disease, gradually with severity. Furthermore, delayed renal recovery negatively impacts on patients' outcomes. Cell cycle arrest biomarkers seem promising to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from the bundles recommended by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines. Hemodynamic management using protocol-based administration of fluids and vasopressors helps reducing AKI. Recent studies have highlighted the benefit of personalizing the blood pressure target according to the patient's resting reference, and avoiding both hypovolemia and fluid overload. Preliminary research has reported encouraging renoprotective effects of angiotensin II and nitric oxide, which need to be confirmed. Moreover, urinary oxygenation monitoring appears feasible and a fair predictor of postoperative AKI. AKI remains a frequent and severe postoperative complication. A personalizedmulticomponent approach might help reducing the risk of AKI and improving patients' outcomes.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titlePerioperative renal protection.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleCurrent opinion in critical care-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre, Austin Health and The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkvilleen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MCC.0000000000000560-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1650-8939-
dc.identifier.pubmedid30308540-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherBellomo, Rinaldo
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

32
checked on Nov 1, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.