Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19658
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMaharaj, Ashika D-
dc.contributor.authorIoannou, Liane-
dc.contributor.authorCroagh, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorZalcberg, John-
dc.contributor.authorNeale, Rachel E-
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, David-
dc.contributor.authorMerrett, Neil-
dc.contributor.authorKench, James G-
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Kate-
dc.contributor.authorPilgrim, Charles H C-
dc.contributor.authorChantrill, Lorraine-
dc.contributor.authorCosman, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorKneebone, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorLipton, Lara-
dc.contributor.authorNikfarjam, Mehrdad-
dc.contributor.authorPhilip, Jennifer-
dc.contributor.authorSandroussi, Charbel-
dc.contributor.authorTagkalidis, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorChye, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorHaghighi, Koroush S-
dc.contributor.authorSamra, Jaswinder-
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Sue M-
dc.date2018-10-10-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T22:28:40Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-23T22:28:40Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association 2019; 21(4): 444-455-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19658-
dc.description.abstractBest practise care optimises survival and quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC), but there is evidence of variability in management and suboptimal care for some patients. Monitoring practise is necessary to underpin improvement initiatives. We aimed to develop a core set of quality indicators that measure quality of care across the disease trajectory. A modified, three-round Delphi survey was performed among experts with wide experience in PC care across three states in Australia. A total of 107 potential quality indicators were identified from the literature and divided into five areas: diagnosis and staging, surgery, other treatment, patient management and outcomes. A further six indicators were added by the panel, increasing potential quality indicators to 113. Rated on a scale of 1-9, indicators with high median importance and feasibility (score 7-9) and low disagreement (<1) were considered in the candidate set. From 113 potential quality indicators, 34 indicators met the inclusion criteria and 27 (7 diagnosis and staging, 5 surgical, 4 other treatment, 5 patient management, 6 outcome) were included in the final set. The developed indicator set can be applied as a tool for internal quality improvement, comparative quality reporting, public reporting and research in PC care.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titleMonitoring quality of care for patients with pancreatic cancer: a modified Delphi consensus.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association-
dc.identifier.affiliationPeninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationGarvan Institute of Medical Research and University of New South Wales, NSW, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationWestern Health, Sunshine, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSt Vincent's Private Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Health, University of Technology, NSW, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, NSW, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMacquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMonash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCabrini, Malvern, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationEpworth Healthcare, Richmond, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAlfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationPeninsula Private Hospital, Frankston, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationKinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, NSW, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMelbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCentral Clinical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationPrince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, NSW, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, NSW, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSydney Nursing School, University of Sydney, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine & Health, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationNorthern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.hpb.2018.08.016-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4866-276X-
dc.identifier.pubmedid30316625-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherNikfarjam, Mehrdad
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery (University of Melbourne)-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

28
checked on Jun 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.