Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19657
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldo-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorGuy, Christopher-
dc.contributor.authorProimos, Helena-
dc.contributor.authorFranceschi, Federica-
dc.contributor.authorCrisman, Marco-
dc.contributor.authorNadkarni, Aniket-
dc.contributor.authorAncona, Paolo-
dc.contributor.authorPan, Kevin-
dc.contributor.authorDi Muzio, Francesca-
dc.contributor.authorPresello, Barbara-
dc.contributor.authorBailey, James-
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Marcus-
dc.contributor.authorHart, Graeme K-
dc.date2018-10-11-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T22:28:39Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-23T22:28:39Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationResuscitation 2018; 133: 167-172en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19657-
dc.description.abstractCommon blood tests can help identify patients at risk of death, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or rapid response team (RRT) call. We aimed to test whether early ICU-team review triggered by such laboratory tests (lab alert) is feasible, safe, and can alter physiological variables, clinical management, and clinical outcomes. In prospective pilot randomized controlled trial in surgical wards of a tertiary hospital, we studied patients admitted for >24 h. We applied a previously validated risk assessment tool to each set of common laboratory tests to identify patients at risk and generate a "lab-alert". We randomly allocated such lab-alert patients to receive early ICU-team review (intervention) or usual care (control). We studied 205 patients (males 54.1%; average age 79 years; 103 randomized to intervention and 102 to usual care). Intervention patients were more likely to trigger RRT activation during their first lab-alert (10.7 vs. 2.0%; P < 0.001) but less likely to receive an allied health referral (18.0% vs. 24.5%; p = 0.007). They were less likely to trigger RRT activation in the 24-h before subsequent alerts (18.4 vs. 22.4%; p = 0.008) and less likely to generate further alerts (204 vs. 320; p < 0.001), but more likely to receive a not for resuscitation or endotracheal intubation status in the 24-h before subsequent alerts (26.6 vs. 17.3%; p = 0.05). Mortality at 24 h was 1.9% for the intervention group vs. 2.9% in the control group (p = 0.63). Finally, overall mortality was 19.4% for intervention patients vs. 23.5% for control patients (p = 0.50). Among surgical patients, lab alerts identify patients with a high mortality. Lab alert-triggered interventions are associated with more first alert-associated RRT activations; more changes in resuscitation status toward a more conservative approach; fewer subsequent alert-associated RRT activations; fewer subsequent alerts, and decreased allied health interventions (ANZCTRN12615000146594).en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAdverse eventsen
dc.subjectIntensive careen
dc.subjectLaboratory testsen
dc.subjectMortalityen
dc.subjectPredictionen
dc.subjectRapid response teamsen
dc.titleLaboratory alerts to guide early intensive care team review in surgical patients: A feasibility, safety, and efficacy pilot randomized controlled trial.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleResuscitationen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationHealth and Biomedical Informatics Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationIncartaPty Ltd, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.012en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1650-8939en
dc.identifier.pubmedid30316952-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherBellomo, Rinaldo
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

54
checked on Sep 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.