Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19520
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRajakariar, Kevin-
dc.contributor.authorKoshy, Anoop N-
dc.contributor.authorSajeev, Jithin K-
dc.contributor.authorNair, Sachin-
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Louise-
dc.contributor.authorTeh, Andrew W-
dc.date2018-07-17-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-25T23:00:21Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-25T23:00:21Z-
dc.date.issued2018-09-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of electrocardiology 2018; 51(5): 884-888-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19520-
dc.description.abstractThe AliveCor Kardia Mobile (AKM) is a handheld, smartphone based cardiac rhythm monitor that records a lead-I electrocardiogram (ECG). Despite being efficacious for detection of atrial fibrillation (AF), it is unclear whether atrial flutter (AFL) may be misdiagnosed as sinus rhythm due to regular R-R intervals. We hypothesised that generating lead-II tracings through repositioning of the AKM may improve visualisation of flutter waves and clinician diagnosis of AFL compared to traditional lead-I tracings. A prospective, multi-centre, validation study was conducted comparing standard lead-I AKM positioning with lead-II in AFL. A mixed cohort of lead I tracings from patients in AF and sinus rhythm were also included. Two independent electrophysiologists (EP) analysed all ECGs blinded to the automated device diagnosis. Fifty patients were recruited, 11 in atrial flutter, 14 in atrial fibrillation, and 25 in sinus rhythm. Lead-I AFL sensitivity was 27.3% for both EP's which individually improved to 72.7% and 54.6% in lead-II. AKM appropriately diagnosed lead-I AFL as unclassified in 18.2% of cases, compared to 54.5% in lead-II. Overall clinician agreement (AF, SR and AFL) was modest utilising AFL lead-I (EP1: κ = 0.71, EP2: κ = 0.73, p < 0.001), which improved with lead-II tracings (EP1: κ = 0.87, EP2: κ = 0.83, both p < 0.001). Repositioning of the AKM device improves clinician diagnosis of atrial flutter. A lead-II tracing may be considered in high-risk patients to improve detection of atrial flutter.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAliveCor-
dc.subjectAtrial flutter-
dc.subjectKardia Mobile-
dc.subjectSmartphone-
dc.subjectWireless-
dc.titleModified positioning of a smartphone based single-lead electrocardiogram device improves detection of atrial flutter.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of electrocardiology-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiology, Monash University, Eastern Health Clinical School, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiology, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMonash University, Eastern Health Clinical School, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.07.008-
dc.identifier.pubmedid30177334-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

4
checked on Feb 1, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.