Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19410
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHall, Sarah E-
dc.contributor.authorWrench, Joanne M-
dc.contributor.authorConnellan, Madeleine-
dc.contributor.authorOtt, Neira-
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Sarah J-
dc.date2018-08-06-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-17T01:47:06Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-17T01:47:06Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2019; 100(3): 464-473en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19410-
dc.description.abstractTo investigate whether emotional intelligence skills measured via the Perceiving, Understanding and Managing Emotions branches of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) V2.0 are associated with community integration and return-to-work (RTW) following moderate-to-severe acquired brain injury (ABI), after accounting for other established predictors. Retrospective cohort study. Outpatient follow-up services within two specialist ABI rehabilitation centers in [location removed]. Eighty-two individuals with moderate-to-severe ABI discharged from inpatient rehabilitation and living in the community (2 months to 7 years post-injury). Not applicable. Community Integration Questionnaire scores for the total sample (N = 82; age range 18-80) and RTW status (employed vs not employed) for the subset of participants employed prior to ABI (n = 71; age range 19-66). Hierarchical logistic and multiple regression analyses were used to examine the unique contribution of Perceiving, Understanding and Managing Emotions scores to RTW and community integration, after controlling for demographic, injury-related, psychological and cognitive predictors. As a set, the three EI variables did not explain incremental variance in outcomes. However, individually, Understanding Emotions predicted RTW (adjusted odds ratio = 3.10, p = .03), χ2(12) = 35.52, p < .001, and Managing Emotions predicted community integration (ß = 0.23, p = .036), F(12,69) = 5.14, p < .001. Although the EI constructs in combination did not improve prediction beyond the effects of established variables, individual components of strategic EI may be important for specific participation outcomes after ABI.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectbrain injuriesen
dc.subjectcommunity integrationen
dc.subjectemotional intelligenceen
dc.subjectreturn to worken
dc.titleThe Role of Emotional Intelligence in Community Integration and Return to Work after Acquired Brain Injury.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitationen
dc.identifier.affiliationMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal Talbot Rehabilitation Centre, Austin Health, Kew, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCaulfield Hospital, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.029en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid30092203-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherHall, Sarah E
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptPsychology-
crisitem.author.deptPsychology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

64
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.